arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/09/2022 12:51 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk 1 NANCY P. DOUMANIAN, ESQ., State Bar No.: 168925 DOUMANIAN & ASSOCIATES 2 837 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, California 91105 3 Telephone: (626) 795-5802 Facsimile: (626) 795-5832 4 Email: nancy@nancylaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant, PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity, 6 PUBLIC ENTITY DEFENDANT, NO FILING FEE PER GOV’ T. CODE § 6103 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 JANE DOE, a minor, by and through her CASE NO. BC662842 guardian ad litem, KATHRYN T. [Assigned to the Honorable Patrick Madden, 12 MCGUIGAN, Department S28] 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT’S RESPONSE AND 14 v. OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON 15 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE #6 DISTRICT, BRIAN MCDONALD, in His TO EXCLUDE SUBSEQUENT 16 Official Capacity as Superintendent of REMEDIAL MEASURES AS TO Pasadena Unified School District, FOCUS EMPLOYEE LANCE GREEN; 17 POINT ACADEMY, MICHAEL BELL, in MEMORANDUM OF POINT AND His Official Capacity as Principal of Focus AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF 18 Point Academy, KELLY RANEY, in Her Official Capacity as Teacher at Focus Point SUBMITTED: JUNE 9, 2022 19 Academy, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS ANGELES 20 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, ROE 1, A MINOR, ROE PARENT 1-5; ROE 21 2, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 6-10, ROE 3, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 11- 22 15, AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, 23 Defendants. 24 25 COMES NOW Defendant PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and hereby 26 submits this OPPOSITION/REPLY to plaintiff’s Supplemental Brief on defendant’s Motion in 27 Limine #6 to exclude subsequent remedial measures. 28 -1- DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE #6 TO EXCLUDE SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES AS TO EMPLOYEE LANCE GREEN