On May 25, 2017 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mcguigan Kathryn T.,
and
Academy Focus Point,
Bell Michael,
County Of Los Angeles,
Los Angeles Department Of Mental Health,
Mcdonald Brian,
Pasadena Unified School District,
Raney Kelly,
Roe Parent 11-15,
Roe Parent 1-5,
Roe Parent 6-10,
for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/06/2022 10:39 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Ballesteros,Deputy Clerk
1 PANISH I SHEA I BOYLE I RAVIPUDI LLP
BRIAN J. PANISH, State Bar No. 116060
2 panish@psblaw.com
DAVID RUDORFER, State Bar No. 254666
3 rudorfer@psblaw.com
WYATT A. VESPERMANN, State Bar No. 322865
4 vespermann@psblaw.com
11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700
5 Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: 310.477.1700
6 Facsimile: 310.477.1699
7 SHERI E. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 106305
ROBERT I. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 102781
8 MANUWAL & MANUWAL
100 N. Westlake Boulevard, Suite 203
9 Westlake Village, CA 91362
Telephone: 818.715.6040
10 Facsimile: 818.715.6030
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
14
15 "JANE DOE", a person with a disability by Case No. BC662842
and through her Guardian ad Litem
16 KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Assigned to Hon. Judge Patrick T. Madden,
Dept. S28]
17 Plaintiff,
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
18 v. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO.
11 TO PRECLUDE THE USE OF THE
19 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, MINOR PLAINTIFF'S JUVENILE
a public entity; FOCUS POINT ACADEMY, COURT FILE WHICH WAS NEVER
20 a public entity; BRIAN MCDONALD, an PRODUCED DURING DISCOVERY;
individual; MICHAEL BELL, an individual; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
21 KELLY RANEY, an individual; COUNTY AUTHORITIES
OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS
22 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL [Complaint filed: 05/25/2017]
HEAL TH, a public entity; and DOES 1 [Trial Date: 05/19/2022]
23 through 50, Inclusive,
24 Defendants.
25
26
27
28
1
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE No. 11 To PRECLUDE THE USE OF THE MINOR PLAINTIFF'S
TT TVFNTT F rm TRT FIT F WHTrH w A's NFVFR PR nm ,ri:;n n, TRTNr: n,._rnVFRV
Document Filed Date
July 06, 2022
Case Filing Date
May 25, 2017
Category
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Jury Verdict 08/23/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.