arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/06/2022 10:39 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Ballesteros,Deputy Clerk 1 PANISH I SHEA I BOYLE I RAVIPUDI LLP BRIAN J. PANISH, State Bar No. 116060 2 panish@psblaw.com DAVID RUDORFER, State Bar No. 254666 3 rudorfer@psblaw.com WYATT A. VESPERMANN, State Bar No. 322865 4 vespermann@psblaw.com 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 5 Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: 310.477.1700 6 Facsimile: 310.477.1699 7 SHERI E. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 106305 ROBERT I. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 102781 8 MANUWAL & MANUWAL 100 N. Westlake Boulevard, Suite 203 9 Westlake Village, CA 91362 Telephone: 818.715.6040 10 Facsimile: 818.715.6030 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 14 15 "JANE DOE", a person with a disability by Case No. BC662842 and through her Guardian ad Litem 16 KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Assigned to Hon. Judge Patrick T. Madden, Dept. S28] 17 Plaintiff, REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF 18 v. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 11 TO PRECLUDE THE USE OF THE 19 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, MINOR PLAINTIFF'S JUVENILE a public entity; FOCUS POINT ACADEMY, COURT FILE WHICH WAS NEVER 20 a public entity; BRIAN MCDONALD, an PRODUCED DURING DISCOVERY; individual; MICHAEL BELL, an individual; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 21 KELLY RANEY, an individual; COUNTY AUTHORITIES OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS 22 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL [Complaint filed: 05/25/2017] HEAL TH, a public entity; and DOES 1 [Trial Date: 05/19/2022] 23 through 50, Inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 1 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE No. 11 To PRECLUDE THE USE OF THE MINOR PLAINTIFF'S TT TVFNTT F rm TRT FIT F WHTrH w A's NFVFR PR nm ,ri:;n n, TRTNr: n,._rnVFRV