arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/17/2022 08:05 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk 1 PANISH I SHEA I BOYLE I RA VIPUDI LLP BRIAN J. PANISH, State Bar No. 116060 2 panish@psblaw.com DAYID RUDORFER, State Bar No. 254666 3 rud01.fer@psblaw.com 4 WYA TT A. VESPERMANN, State Bar No. 322865 wvespermann@psblaw.com 5 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 Los Angeles, California 90025 6 Telephone: 310.477.1700 Facsimile: 310.477.1699 7 8 SHERIE. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 106305 ROBERT I. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 102781 9 MANUWAL & MANUWAL 100 N. Westlake Boulevard, Suite 203 lO Westlake Village, CA 91362 Telephone: 818.715.6040 11 Facsimile: 818.715.6030 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 15 16 LATRINA GRAY, a minor by and through her Case No. BC662842 17 Guardian ad Litem KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Assigned to Hon. Judge Patrick T. Madden, 18 Dept. S28} 19 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO 20 V. DEFENDANT PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION FOR 21 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, NONSUIT; DECLARATION OF a public entity, COUNSEL 22 23 Defendant. [Complaint filed: 05/25/2017] 24 [Trial Date: 08/1/2022] 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendant Pasadena Unified School District's Motion For Nonsuit