arrow left
arrow right
  • JULIO HERNANDEZ VS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC ET AL Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JULIO HERNANDEZ VS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC ET AL Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/14/2019 02:21 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by P. Offord,Deputy Clerk LEHRMAN LAW GROUP KATE S. LEHRMAN [Bar No. 123050] DANIELR. VILLEGAS [Bar No. 159935] BLAKE H. RAMSAY [Bar No. 300025] 12121 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1300 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 917-4500 (310) 917-5677 (FAX) Attorneys for Defendants BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and NICK ALEXANDERIMPORTS, d/b/a NICK ALEXANDERBMW 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES —CENTRAL DISTRICT 12 JULIO HERNANDEZ, .)Case No. BC666145 13 ) [Filed: June 22, 2017] 14 Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. Michelle W. Court 15 V. ) Dept. 74 16 ) BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a ) 17 Delaware Limited Liability Company, NICK ) REPLY MEMORANDUMOF POINTS ALEXANDERIMPORTS, a California ) AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS Corporation d/b/a NICK ALEXANDER BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC AND NICK ALEXANDERIMPORTS DBA 19 BMW, and DOES I through 10, inclusive, NICK ALEXANDERBMW IN SUPPORT ) OF MOTION IN LIMINENO. 11 FOR 20 Defendants. ) ORDER EXCLUDINGEVIDENCE OR ) ARGUMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S 21 EXPECTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ) VEHICLE AND WHETHER VEHICLE 22 MET PLAINTIFF'S EXPECTATIONS ) 23 ) ) DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: 05/20/19 24 ) MOTION CUT-OFF: 06/03/19 25 ) TRIAL DATE: 06/24/19 26 27 28 65.417.BR - 00393196.DOC I BC666146 REPLY MEMORANDUMOF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANTS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC AND NICK ALEXANDERIMPORTS DBA NICK ALEXANDERBMW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINENO. 11 FOR ORDER EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S EXPECTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO VEHICLE AND WHETHER VEHICLE MET PLAINTIFF'S EXPECTATIONS