On June 12, 2017 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mora Leticia,
and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
~
LETICIA MORA
riorFut of Califomi
9932 52" Street
Riverside, CA 92509
Ro unty of Los Annales
Plaintiff Pro Se MAY 04 2018
Sh errlR. Cj xguuuve Ufficgr/Cler.
By. jeputy
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
LETICIA MORA
Case No. BC664690
10 Plaintiff(s), Dept. No. 37
VS,
1
DUETSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
12 COMPANY, etal PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMMENDED
Defendant(s) COMPLAINT & DEMAND FOR JURY
13 TRIAL
14
15 NOW COMES Plaintiff LETICIA MORA whom in civil proper person’s status hereby submits
16 this Amended Complaint. The Plaintiffs Complaint dually meets and exceeds the standards governing the
form of a complaint contemplated by California Code of Civil Procedures this Court has subject
17
jurisdiction inthis matter, and the Complaint in sufficiently alleges frauds and Intentional
18
misrepresentation, in tandem with other violations detailed and examined herein, coupled with actual
19
harm and continued damages.
«20
wa INTRODUCTION
21
This claim stems from and commences.on account of and as a result of negligent actions leading
32
bom up to, during, and after a deficient process to execute a mortgage debt. Said debt being a Junior Lien, of
8 ;
23 which was presented, market, sold in a false and fraudulent light. However, this case highlights a
24 wrongful foreclosure, which in itself not an independent cause of action, but rather an effect or result of
8 -
Page 1 of 7
Document Filed Date
May 04, 2018
Case Filing Date
June 12, 2017
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 09/06/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
~ LETICIA MORA riorFut of Califomi 9932 52" Street Riverside, CA 92509 Ro unty of Los Annales Plaintiff Pro Se MAY 04 2018 Sh errlR. Cj xguuuve Ufficgr/Cler. By. jeputy THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT LETICIA MORA Case No. BC664690 10 Plaintiff(s), Dept. No. 37 VS, 1 DUETSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 12 COMPANY, etal PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMMENDED Defendant(s) COMPLAINT & DEMAND FOR JURY 13 TRIAL 14 15 NOW COMES Plaintiff LETICIA MORA whom in civil proper person’s status hereby submits 16 this Amended Complaint. The Plaintiffs Complaint dually meets and exceeds the standards governing the form of a complaint contemplated by California Code of Civil Procedures this Court has subject 17 jurisdiction inthis matter, and the Complaint in sufficiently alleges frauds and Intentional 18 misrepresentation, in tandem with other violations detailed and examined herein, coupled with actual 19 harm and continued damages. «20 wa INTRODUCTION 21 This claim stems from and commences.on account of and as a result of negligent actions leading 32 bom up to, during, and after a deficient process to execute a mortgage debt. Said debt being a Junior Lien, of 8 ; 23 which was presented, market, sold in a false and fraudulent light. However, this case highlights a 24 wrongful foreclosure, which in itself not an independent cause of action, but rather an effect or result of 8 - Page 1 of 7