arrow left
arrow right
  • MARVYN GORDON VS CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARVYN GORDON VS CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/28/2022 08:11 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Lopez,Deputy Clerk 1 Robert C. Reback, Esq. (State Bar No. 58092) Stephen A. Diamond, Esq. (State Bar No. 176735) 2 REBACK, MCANDREWS & BLESSEY, LLP 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 450 3 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Telephone (310) 297-9900 4 Facsimile (310) 297-9800 rreback@rmblawyer.com 5 sdiamond@rmblawyer.com 6 Attorneys for Defendants, CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER and ANDREW F. IPPOLITI, M.D. 7 a SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 MARVYN GORDON, ) Case No.: BC666118 ) 12 Plaintiff, ) DEFENDANTS, CEDARS-SINAI 13 ) MEDICAL CENTER AND ANDREW F. V. ) IPPOLITI, M.D.'s MOTION IN LIMINE 14 ) NO. 2 TO PROHIBIT EXAMINATION OF CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER; ) ANY EXPERT CALLED TO TESTIFY IN 15 ANDREW F. IPPOLITI, M.D.; and DOES 1 ) THIS ACTION AS TO HIS OR HER 16 through 20, Inclusive, ) PERSONAL PRACTICES AS OPPOSED ) TO THE STANDARD OF CARE 17 Defendants. ) _________________) [Honorable Jon R. Takasugi, Department 31} 18 19 Complaint filed: June 28, 2017 FSC Date: March 7, 2022 2o Trial Date: March 16, 2022 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants, CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER and 23 ANDREW F. IPPOLITI, M.D. (hereinafter "Defendants") respectfully request that this Court preclude 24 Plaintiffs counsel from asking questions of any treating physician or expert witness regarding what his 25 or her own course of practice might have been in treating the patient, MARVYN GORDON. These 26 types of questions can only elicit testimony and evidence which are irrelevant and prejudicial to 27 Defendants. 28 1 DEFENDANTS, CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER AND ANDREW F. IPPOLITI, M.D.'s MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO PROHIBIT EXAMINATION OF ANY EXPERT CALLED TO TESTIFY IN THIS ACTION AS TO HIS OR HER PERSONAL PRACTICES AS OPPOSED TO THE STANDARD OF CARE