On June 01, 2022 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Parafeinik, Oxana,
and
Does 1-2,
Strong Bridge Management Llc,
Voita, Carol,
for Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
V mmfiflflfl
COLLEEN A. DEZIEL (Bar No. 164282)
cad@amclaw.com
PETER B. RUSTIN (Bar No. 181734) 8UPER; F I
pbr@amclaw.com SzegA’TY gpoéng-‘D
ANDERSON, McPHARLIN & CONNERS LLP E"~AHd,‘3’gEn~Angcl’H~u
’V’L
707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 4000
JUL 01mm
Los Angeles, California 90017-3623 7 3 202
OQQQMAMN—
TELEPHONE: (213) 688-0080 O FACSIMILE: (213) 622-7594
n 3
Attorneys for Defendants,
CAROL VOITA; and STRONG BRIDGE MANAGEMENT l.
LLC (erroneously sued as Carol Voita - Sole Member/Manager
Strong Bridge Management LLC)
SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 711
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT .X
L)!“
mO
LLP
4000
ufl OXANA PARAFEINIK, Case No. CIVSBZZIO600
7-3623
622-7594
m N Plaintiff, The Hon. Gilbert Ochoa, Dept. 824
W
CONNERS
SUITE
9001
3)
8L
(21 u— U VS- Action Filed: June l, 2022
FAX
LAWYERS
BOULEVARD,
CALIFORNIA
- —A CAROL VOITA; CAROL VOITA - SOLE
MCPHARLIN
MEMBER/MANAGER STRONG BRIDGE ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
688-0080
m LII MANAGEMENT LLC; and DOES TO 2, I
MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE
ANGELES,
DEFENSES
WILSHIRE
3)
H a Defendants.
ANDERSON,
(21 Date: March 29, 2023
\l
H Time:
707 LOS
TEL
8:30 a.m.
Dept.: $24
Trial Date: None
The hearing on Plaintiff‘s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses was held on March 29,
2023 in Department $24 of the above—entitled Court. Peter B. Rustin, Esq. of Anderson,
McPharlin & Conners LLP appeared on behalf of Defendants CAROL VOITA and STRONG
NNNNNNNNNi—u
BRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC (“Opposing Party"). PlaintifTand moving party OXANA
”\IGMAUNHGOQ
PARAFEINIK appeared in pro per. There were no other appearances.
Upon consideration of the moving and opposing papers, and hearing the oral argument of
the parties, the Court adopts its tentative ruling as its final order and rules as follows:
/ / /
/ / /
l
2723539] 05896482
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
l. The motion is denied as untimely. The Court adopts the Opposing Party‘s position
set forth at pages 2-3 of its opposition.
2. Defendants are ordered to give notice and prepare an order for the Court’s
signature.
SO ORDERED.
a
IT IS
wmflQUIAMN
”UL 13 2023
DATED:
THE H N'GILBERT OCHOA
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
GILBERT G. OCHOA
10
LLP
11
4000
7-3623
622-7594
CONNERS 12
SUITE
9001
3)
8L
(21 13
FAX
LAWYERS
BOULEVARD,
CALIFORNIA
0 l4
MCPHARLIN
688-0080
15
ANGELES,
WILSHIRE
3)
16
ANDERSON,
(21
707 LOS
17
TEL
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
2723539 05896482
I
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Document Filed Date
July 13, 2023
Case Filing Date
June 01, 2022
Category
Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.