arrow left
arrow right
  • Parafeinik -v- Voita et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Parafeinik -v- Voita et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Parafeinik -v- Voita et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Parafeinik -v- Voita et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V mmfiflflfl COLLEEN A. DEZIEL (Bar No. 164282) cad@amclaw.com PETER B. RUSTIN (Bar No. 181734) 8UPER; F I pbr@amclaw.com SzegA’TY gpoéng-‘D ANDERSON, McPHARLIN & CONNERS LLP E"~AHd,‘3’gEn~Angcl’H~u ’V’L 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 4000 JUL 01mm Los Angeles, California 90017-3623 7 3 202 OQQQMAMN— TELEPHONE: (213) 688-0080 O FACSIMILE: (213) 622-7594 n 3 Attorneys for Defendants, CAROL VOITA; and STRONG BRIDGE MANAGEMENT l. LLC (erroneously sued as Carol Voita - Sole Member/Manager Strong Bridge Management LLC) SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 711 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT .X L)!“ mO LLP 4000 ufl OXANA PARAFEINIK, Case No. CIVSBZZIO600 7-3623 622-7594 m N Plaintiff, The Hon. Gilbert Ochoa, Dept. 824 W CONNERS SUITE 9001 3) 8L (21 u— U VS- Action Filed: June l, 2022 FAX LAWYERS BOULEVARD, CALIFORNIA - —A CAROL VOITA; CAROL VOITA - SOLE MCPHARLIN MEMBER/MANAGER STRONG BRIDGE ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 688-0080 m LII MANAGEMENT LLC; and DOES TO 2, I MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE ANGELES, DEFENSES WILSHIRE 3) H a Defendants. ANDERSON, (21 Date: March 29, 2023 \l H Time: 707 LOS TEL 8:30 a.m. Dept.: $24 Trial Date: None The hearing on Plaintiff‘s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses was held on March 29, 2023 in Department $24 of the above—entitled Court. Peter B. Rustin, Esq. of Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP appeared on behalf of Defendants CAROL VOITA and STRONG NNNNNNNNNi—u BRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC (“Opposing Party"). PlaintifTand moving party OXANA ”\IGMAUNHGOQ PARAFEINIK appeared in pro per. There were no other appearances. Upon consideration of the moving and opposing papers, and hearing the oral argument of the parties, the Court adopts its tentative ruling as its final order and rules as follows: / / / / / / l 2723539] 05896482 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES l. The motion is denied as untimely. The Court adopts the Opposing Party‘s position set forth at pages 2-3 of its opposition. 2. Defendants are ordered to give notice and prepare an order for the Court’s signature. SO ORDERED. a IT IS wmflQUIAMN ”UL 13 2023 DATED: THE H N'GILBERT OCHOA JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT GILBERT G. OCHOA 10 LLP 11 4000 7-3623 622-7594 CONNERS 12 SUITE 9001 3) 8L (21 13 FAX LAWYERS BOULEVARD, CALIFORNIA 0 l4 MCPHARLIN 688-0080 15 ANGELES, WILSHIRE 3) 16 ANDERSON, (21 707 LOS 17 TEL 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 2723539 05896482 I ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES