arrow left
arrow right
  • The Red Brennan Group -v- Jimenez et al Print Writ of Mandate Unlimited  document preview
  • The Red Brennan Group -v- Jimenez et al Print Writ of Mandate Unlimited  document preview
  • The Red Brennan Group -v- Jimenez et al Print Writ of Mandate Unlimited  document preview
  • The Red Brennan Group -v- Jimenez et al Print Writ of Mandate Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

THE SUTTON LAW FIRM, PC Bradley W. Hertz, State Bar No. 138564 SUPER! bhertz@campaignlawyers.com COUN’ CALIFORNIE ‘DING: 22815 Ventura Boulevard, #405 Los Angeles, CA 91364 Tel: (818) 593-2949 * Fax: (415) 732-7701 BEC @ ganz? SANDERS POLITICAL LAW BY yf A, Nicholas L. Sanders, State Bar No. 307402 LAURA a DEPUTY icholas@sanderspoliticallaw.com 1121 L Street, Suite 105 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 242-7414 * Fax: (916) 242-8824 Attorneys for Real Party in Interest [NO FILING FEE DUE PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CODE SECTION 6103] 10 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 12 13 THE RED BRENNAN GROUP, Case No: CIV SB 2218598 14 Petitioner/Plaintiff, (Assigned for All Purposes to the Hon. 15 Judge Winston Keh - Department S33) Vv. 16 REAL PARTY IN INTEREST SAN 17 MICHAEL JIMENEZ, in his official BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF capacity as San Bernardino County SUPERVISORS’ EVIDENTIARY 18 Registrar of Voters; and DOES 1 through 10, OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF inclusive, ALEXANDER A. FRANK AND TO 19 EXHIBITS THERETO 20 Respondents/Defendants. Date: December 15, 2022 21 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: $33 22 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD 23 OF SUPERVISORS, Initial Pleading Filed: September 28, 2022 24 Real Party in Interest. First Amended Pleading Filed: 25 October 25, 2022 26 27 28 REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS Real Party in Interest the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (the “Board”) hereby objects to Petitioner/Plaintiff THE RED BRENNAN GROUP’s (“Petitioner”) evidence provided in support of its Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, and particularly the Declaration of Alexander A. Frank and exhibits thereto, as follows: Material Objected to Evidentiary Objection Ruling on Objectio 1. “In July of 2022, the California 1) Relevance (Evidence Sustained: 10 court of appeal issued a tentative Code section 350). ll opinion partially reversing the trial 2) Its probative value is Overruled: 12 court ruling and essentially substantially outweighed upholding Measure K. (A true and by the probability that its 13 correct copy of the California Court admission will create 14 of Appeal tentative opinion is substantial danger of 15 attached hereto as Exhibit C).” undue prejudice and of 16 (Declaration of Alexander A. confusing the issues. 17 Frank, 2:18-20) (Evidence Code section 18 352). 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS