On September 28, 2022 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
The Red Brennan Group,
and
Does 1 Through 50,
Jimenez, Michael,
for Writ of Mandate Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
THE SUTTON LAW FIRM, PC
Bradley W. Hertz, State Bar No. 138564
SUPER!
bhertz@campaignlawyers.com COUN’
CALIFORNIE
‘DING:
22815 Ventura Boulevard, #405
Los Angeles, CA 91364
Tel: (818) 593-2949 * Fax: (415) 732-7701 BEC @ ganz?
SANDERS POLITICAL LAW BY yf A,
Nicholas L. Sanders, State Bar No. 307402 LAURA a DEPUTY
icholas@sanderspoliticallaw.com
1121 L Street, Suite 105
Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel: (916) 242-7414 * Fax: (916) 242-8824
Attorneys for Real Party in Interest [NO FILING FEE DUE PER
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CODE SECTION 6103]
10
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
12
13
THE RED BRENNAN GROUP, Case No: CIV SB 2218598
14
Petitioner/Plaintiff, (Assigned for All Purposes to the Hon.
15 Judge Winston Keh - Department S33)
Vv.
16
REAL PARTY IN INTEREST SAN
17 MICHAEL JIMENEZ, in his official BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF
capacity as San Bernardino County SUPERVISORS’ EVIDENTIARY
18 Registrar of Voters; and DOES 1 through 10, OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF
inclusive, ALEXANDER A. FRANK AND TO
19
EXHIBITS THERETO
20 Respondents/Defendants.
Date: December 15, 2022
21 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept: $33
22
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD
23 OF SUPERVISORS, Initial Pleading Filed:
September 28, 2022
24 Real Party in Interest.
First Amended Pleading Filed:
25 October 25, 2022
26
27
28 REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
Real Party in Interest the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS (the “Board”) hereby objects to Petitioner/Plaintiff THE RED
BRENNAN GROUP’s (“Petitioner”) evidence provided in support of its Amended
Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, and
particularly the Declaration of Alexander A. Frank and exhibits thereto, as follows:
Material Objected to Evidentiary Objection Ruling on Objectio
1. “In July of 2022, the California 1) Relevance (Evidence Sustained:
10 court of appeal issued a tentative Code section 350).
ll opinion partially reversing the trial 2) Its probative value is Overruled:
12 court ruling and essentially substantially outweighed
upholding Measure K. (A true and by the probability that its
13
correct copy of the California Court admission will create
14
of Appeal tentative opinion is substantial danger of
15
attached hereto as Exhibit C).” undue prejudice and of
16
(Declaration of Alexander A. confusing the issues.
17
Frank, 2:18-20) (Evidence Code section
18
352).
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
Document Filed Date
December 02, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 28, 2022
Category
Writ of Mandate Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.