arrow left
arrow right
  • SMITH-V-DLS EVENTS Print Employment - Complex  document preview
  • SMITH-V-DLS EVENTS Print Employment - Complex  document preview
  • SMITH-V-DLS EVENTS Print Employment - Complex  document preview
  • SMITH-V-DLS EVENTS Print Employment - Complex  document preview
						
                                

Preview

F I L E \U SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIF COUNTY or SAN BERNARtgmg SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT Tara Zabehi (SBN 3 14706) TravisMaher (SBN 327206) J. AUG - 4 2023 LAWYERSfor JUSTICE, PC 410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203 Glendale, California 91203 Tel: (818) 265-1020 / Fax: (818) 265-1021 JES ICA GA "1&2, Epm‘ * fittomeysfor Plaintiffiasminc Smith John T. Egley (SBN 232545) Ellen C. Cohen (SBN 276458) CALL & JENSEN 61 0 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (949) 717-3000 / Fax: (949) 717-3100 Attorneysfor Defendant DLS Events, LLC 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 13 JASMINE SMITH. individually, and on behalf of Case No.: CIVDSZOO3900 other members of thegeneral public similarly 14 situated and on behalf of other aggrieved Honorable Joseph T. Ortiz employees pursuant to the California Private Department S 1 7 15 Attorneys General Act; CLASS ACTION 16 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION T0 vs. 17 CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR DLS EVENTS, LLC, MOTION FORELASS PLAINTIFF’S an unknown business 18 CERTIFICATION; [PROPOSED] entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive ORDER THEREON 19 Defendants. [JOINr s TA TEMENT RE.- FUR THER CA SE 20 MA NA GEMENT CONFERENCE FIL ED CONCURRENTL Y HERE WITH] 21 Complaint Filed: February 11, 2020 22 FAC Filed: July 22, 2020 Jury Trial Date: None Set 23 fi 7/0 507/073-— Bq Ola? 24 «*0 Egg!” "7;: 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADL FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; [PR ED] ORDER THEREON \z \z Plaintiff Jasmine Smith (“Plaintiff") and Defendant DLS Events, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”). by and through their respective counsel of record. hcrcby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint for Damages on February 11, 2020. asserting ten causes 0f action for Defendant’s alleged violation 0f the California Labor Code and Califomia Business & Professions Code §§ 17200, et seq.; WHERAS. on February 19. 2020. this case was assigned to Judge David Cohn in the Complex Litigation Program in Department S-26; WHEREAS. 0n 0r about March 4. 2020, the State of California declared a state 0f 10 emergency in connection with the COVID-l 9 pandemic; 11 WHEREAS. at thc July 14. 2020 Initial Status Conference, duc t0 Defendant‘s financial 12 issues expressed t0 the Court by counsel for Defendant, as a direct result of the COVID-l9 l3 pandemic shuttering all music events in California and severely impacting Ihc music festival l4 industry, the Court continued the stay 0n discovery, and instructed the Parties that a potential 15 lift on the stay ofdiscovery would be addressed at the next status conference; l6 WHEREAS. 0n July 22. 2020. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint which added 17 one cause ofaction, pursuant to California Labor Code §§ 2698 et seq. for enforcement under 18 the Private Attorneys Genera] Act (“PAGA”) for Defendant’s alleged California Labor Code 19 violations. Defendant timely filed an Answer on August 24, 202 l; 20 WHEREAS. due l0 the continuing effects of the COVID pandemic on Defendant‘s 21 business, discovery remained stayed until June 8, 202], at which time Plaintiff promptly 22 propoundcd written discovery requests and deposition notices; 23 WHEREAS. Defendant served responses t0 Plaintiff’s discovery‘ and the Parties 24 subsequently met and conferred regarding Defendant’s responses. In connection with those 25 meet-and-confer efforts, Defendant produced additional class data and information. The Parties 26 continue t0 meet and confer in good faith in hopes of resolving any remaining discovery issues 27 cooperatively and obviating the need for motion practice; 28 WHEREAS, both Parties have expressed an interest in exploring a negotiated resolution 2 JOINT STIPULATION T()CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON