arrow left
arrow right
  • SUSAN SHUM VS AIR CANADA INC ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SUSAN SHUM VS AIR CANADA INC ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. 181557 Se Bar No. 252392 “8 ouWorinty Courof Losrt ot Califomia Angeles meurtis@bakerlp.com BAKER CURTIS & SCHWARTZ, P.C. APR 04 2018 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3520 San Francisco, CA.94104 Clerk Telephone: (415) 433-1064 Gomez Deputy Fax: (415) 366-2525 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN SHUM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUSAN SHUM, Case No. BC689620 10 Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF MICHAEL il CURTIS IN SUPPORT OF vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 AIR CANADA, INC., ALIOUNE SOW, and Judge: Honor Michael L. Stern 13 DOES 1 — 50, Dept.: 62 14 Defendants. 15 I, Michael Curtis, state as follows: 16 1 Tam Plaintiffs counsel of record in this matter. I have personal knowledge of these 17 facts. 18 2 I prepared-the proposed protective order submitted to the Court by adapting the 19 Court’s model protective order. 20 3 Attached to this declaration is a true and correct copy of the comparison I ran of the 21 Court’s.model protective order and the proposed protective order submitted in this case. As shown 22 in the comparison, I only entered the case:specific information into the model protective order and 23 a selected among the options the model protective ordér presented. 24 I declare, under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the State of California, “et 25 ro that the.foregoing is true and correct. Executed the 3 day of April, in Pasade seo