On February 09, 2018 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
10Th Street Property Llc,
and
Saghian David,
Saghian Edwih,
Saghian Parvaneh,
Saghian Yahia,
Six Star D.J. Inc.,
for Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
UD-105
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namo, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT
USE ONLY
David Saghian
19528 Ventura Blvd #555
Tarzana, CA 91356
F
‘TELEPHONE NO.: : (310) 420-8007
E-MAILAl SS:
FAXNO.: Superior Court of California
ATTORNEY FOR (Namo In Pro Per County of Los Angeles
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
APR 26 2018
MAILING ADDRESS: : 111 N. Hill Street arjer, executive UtticeriClerk of Court
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 92701 Shei rel
‘BRANCH NAME: : Stanley Mosk Courthouse , Deputy
Plaintiff: 10th Street Property, LLC.
Defendant: Six Star DJ, Inc.; Saghian
CASE NUMBER: DEpAninEM v4
ANSWER UNLAWFUL DETAINER BC693600
Defendant (each defendant for whom this answer is filed must be named and must sign this answer unless his or her attomey
signs): David Saghian
answers the complaint as follows:
-
Check ONLY ONE of the next two boxes:
a. [__] Defendant generally denies each statement of the complaint. (Do not check this box if the complaint demands more than
$1,000.)
b. [5c] Defendant admits that all of the statements of the complaint are true EXCEPT:
(1) Defendant claims the following statements of the complaint are false_ state paragraph numbers from the complaint
or explain below or on form MC-025): [Explanation is on MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(1).
3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 17
(2) Defendant has no information or belief that the following statements of the complaint are true, so defendant denies
them (state paragraph numbers from the complaint or explain below or on form MC-025):
() Explanation is on MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(2).
2,4, 5, 8, 19
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (NOTE: For each box checked, you must state brief facts to support it in item 3k (top of page 2).)
a. (6¢) (nonpayment of rent only) Plaintiff has breached the warranty to provide habitable premises.
b. (nonpayment of rent only) Defendant made needed repairs and properly deducted the cost from the rent, and plaintiff did
not give proper credit.
(nonpayment of rent only) On (date): before the notice to pay or quit expired, defendant offered
the rent due but plaintiff would not accept it.
Plaintiff waived, changed, or canceled the notice to quit.
Plaintiff served defendant with the notice to quit or filed the complaint to retaliate against defendant.
By serving defendant with the notice to quit or filing the complaint, plaintiff is arbitrarily discriminating against the
defendant in violation of the Constitution or the laws of the United States or California.
Plaintiffs demand for possession violates the local rent control or eviction control ordinance of (city or county, title of
ordinance, and date of passage):
~~ {Also, briefly state in item 3k the facts showing violation of the ordinance.)
no Plaintiff accepted rent from defendant to cover a period of time after the date the notice to quit expired.
CI Plaintiff seeks to evict defendant based on acts against defendant or a member of defendant's household that constitute
domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, human trafficking, or abuse of an elder or a dependent adult. (A temporary
restraining order, protective order, or police report not more than 180 days old is required naming you or your household
member as the protected party or a victim of these crimes.)
J [) Other affirmative defenses are stated in item 3k.
Page 1 of 2
Form Approved for Optional Use vil Code, § 1940 et seq;
Judicial Council of Califomia ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER Code of Civil Procedure, § 425.12, § 1161 et seq.
UD-105 (Rev. January 2, 2014] ‘ : . ‘wow.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
April 26, 2018
Case Filing Date
February 09, 2018
Category
Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 10/01/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.