On November 27, 2017 a
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rodriguez Mario,
and
United Parcel Service Inc.,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
te ORIGINAL
CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namo, Stofe Bor number, and edcress): FOR COURT
USE ONLY
Michael J. Bononi (SBN130663); Christy W. Granieri (266392);
Rebecca L. Claudat (SBN315736)
Superior Court
Bononi Law Group, LLP, Suite 820, Pasadena, California 91101 ‘Ounty of L,
of California
‘TELEPHONE NO: (213) 553 9200 FAX NO. (Optionay): (213) 553 9215 0S Angeles
E-walL ADDRESS (Optionay: ¢claudat@bononilawgroup.com
ATTORNEY FOR (amex Mario Rodriguez APR 10 201g
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
Sherri R, njet, txecunye
OtficeriClery
streer aooress: 111 N. Hill Street of Court
MAILING ADDRESS: Obra Robinson » Deputy
cary ano zip Cove: Los Angeles, CA 90012
GRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Mario Rodriguez
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: United Parcel Service, Inc.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): (2) unuimieo case [) umiteo case BC684863
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: April 25, 2018 Time: 8:30 Oept.: 36 Div. Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
(Z) Notice of intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Christy W. Granieri
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [J This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Mario Rodriguez
bv. [J This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only}
a The complaint was filed on (date): November 27, 2017
vb. (7) The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
bv. [) The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [1 have nad a default entered against them (specify names):
m c. [J The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
Be they may be served):
fe
it
4, Description of case
2 a. Type of case in [7 complaint [1 cross-compiaint (Describe, including causes of action):
52
te
am See Attachment - 4a
Pago 1 of 6
Form Adopied fr Mandaton Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Res of Coun,
Eent0 Rev duly 1 2011] ‘ules 3.720-3.730
www. couts 63 gov
Document Filed Date
April 10, 2018
Case Filing Date
November 27, 2017
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 03/04/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.