arrow left
arrow right
  • LILY CHOU, AN INDIVIDUAL VS. VITUS F SUEN Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LILY CHOU, AN INDIVIDUAL VS. VITUS F SUEN Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/15/2020 03:17 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Rios,Deputy Clerk 1 DAVID FU AND ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 2 David D. Fu, SBN 186331 Samuel H. Jones, SBN 291721 3 444 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 205 Arcadia, CA 91006 4 Telephone: (626) 623-6550 Facsimile: (626) 623-6551 5 Email: david@davidfuesq.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant, LILY CHOU 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 LILY CHOU, an individual, ) CASE NO. EC067716 ) 12 Plaintiff, ) Complaint Filed: January 30, 2018 vs. ) 13 ) NOTICE OF ERRATA VITUS F. SUEN, an individual; VIRGINIA ) 14 SUEN, an individual; PATRICK SUEN, an ) Hearing Date: May 22, 2020 individual; ANDREW SUEN, an individual; ) Time: 8:30 a.m. 15 JEFFREY SUEN, an individual; YUK ) Dept.: A LING CHOW, an individual; FRANK ONG; ) Judge: Hon. William D. Stewart 16 an individual; DEL MAR GARDENS L.L.C. ) AKA DEL MAR GARDENS, LLC, a ) RES ID: 525392130758 17 California Limited Liability Company; and ) DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ) 18 ) Defendants. ) 19 __________________________________ ) ) 20 AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT. ) __________________________________ ) 21 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 23 NOTICE is hereby given of errata in the Declaration of Samuel H. Jones in Support of 24 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication and in 25 Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts submitted in support of the same 26 Motion. That Declaration refers to certain exhibits that were inadvertently not attached to the 27 copy that was submitted to the Court, specifically Exhibits 4, 16, and 20. True and correct 28 copies of those exhibits are attached to this Notice. 1 NOTICE OF ERRATA