Document for SHIRLEY WILSON VS GREG OVEROSS ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                FEE WAIVER
v   SHIRLEY WILSON
    110 S Fairfax Ave A11-79
                                                                                   ior Court of California
    323-632-1838                                                                     itv of Los Anaeles

    Plaintiff, In Propria Persona                                                  NOV 20 2017
                                                                         SheriR.                    Officer/Clerk
                                                                          By.                             Deputy




                            SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    FOR THE COUNTY OF Los Angeles - Central DISTRICT

     SHIRLEY WILSON,           an‘individual

             ,
                                                                                    BC 684052
             VS.                                           Case No

     GREG OVEROSS,         an individual, ALTA VISTA        complaint for financial elder abuse
     GARDENS, INC., a California corporation, and
     DOES 1 through 25, inclusive

             Ss.




    Plaintiff Shirley Wilson hereby alleges as follows:
                                               PARTY ALLEGATIONS
           Plaintiff Shirley Wilson (“Plaintiff”) is, and at all relevant times, was an adult resident of the
    County of Los Angeles, California.
           Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant Greg Oveross
    (“Defendant Oveross”) is a resident of and does business in the County of Los Angeles,           California.
           Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that Defendant Alta Vista Gardens, Inc.
    (“Defendant Alta Vista”) is a California corporation that operates a senior residential care facility at
    829 N. Alta Vista Blvd., Los Angeles, California
           The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of
    Defendants named herein as Does 1 through 25, inclusive,      are unknown to Plaintiff, who, therefore,
    sues said Defendants by fictitious names and will seek leave of Court to amend this Complaint to show
    their true names and capacities when they have been ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes,
    and based thereon alleges, that each of the fictitiously named Defendants, named herein as Does 1
    through 25, are legally responsible in some manner for the occurrences herein alleged, and that
    Plaintiff’s damages as herein alleged were caused in part by said fictitiously named Defendants. The
    namé@, individual defendants and defendants Does 1 through 25 are hereafter collectively referred to
    herein: as “Defendants”.
         ¢ Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that at all times herein mentioned,
    each ‘and every Defendant herein was the agent and/or employee of the other Defendants, and each of
    them, and was acting within the scope, purpose and authority of that agency and/or employment and
    with the knowledge, permission and consent of said co-Defendants, and each of them