arrow left
arrow right
  • PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES CENTINELA LLC VS BONITA FINNEY ET1 Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES CENTINELA LLC VS BONITA FINNEY ET1 Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

3 @ CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and adaress}: {smail Amin — Kevin T. Meade SBN SBN 23123 195349; Scott Halberstadt SBN 190736 Couney Pes The Amin Law Group 2211 Michelson Drive, Suite 1270, Irvine CA 92612 NOV 2 0 2017 Ur tevepHoneno: 949-502-7715 FAX NO; (Options): 949-266-8406 iter g. a E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona)); iamin@aminlaws grou com By. ATTORNEY FOR Name): [Prime Health: ss *Coeb ntinela, LE Glorie., = deputy a Ke SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles ‘STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH. NAME: Stanley Mosk CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Prime Healthcare Services-Centinela, LLC DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Bonita Finney; Angela Gordon JUDICIAL OF FIGERA Ap 68 o A168 = - OEPT,: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE = = By Fax Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1 Title: The Estate of Mabel Bradford A.K.A Mabel Elizabeth Bradford Case number: 17STPB00996 Court: same as above (1 other state or federal court (name and address): Department: Case type: { } limited civit [ ] unlimited civil LY] probate [ ] family law [—] other (specify): Filing date: Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" [) Yes No Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check ail that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims: arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property., is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges,, (J Additional explanation is attached in attachment th Status of case: pending } dismissed ( J with ] without prejudice (J. disposed of by judgment a. Title: db. Case number: c. Court: [7]; same as above m C4 other state or federal court (name and address): nm d. Department: Page tof 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal, Rules of Count, rule 3,300 Judicial Counci of Califomia NOTICE OF RELATED CASE ‘www.courinfo,ca.gov (CM-015 (Rev, July 1, 2007)