arrow left
arrow right
  • PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES CENTINELA LLC VS BONITA FINNEY ET1 Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES CENTINELA LLC VS BONITA FINNEY ET1 Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

4 * onicitiel "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address}: FOR COURT USE ONLY CM-110. Kevin T. Meade SBN:195349 The Amin Law Group 2211 Michelson Drive, Suite 1270, Irvine CA 92612 TevepHoneNo; 949-502-7715 FAX NO.(Options): 949-266-8406 FILED E-MAIL ADORESS (Optons): kmeade@talglaw.com Superior Court of California County of Fas Angeles ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Prime Healthcare Services - Centinela, LLC ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles street aporess: 111 North Hill Street JUL 272018 maiune aooress: 111 North Hill Street city AND zip cove: Los Angeles, CA 90012 Sherri kK. Cass, cacuutive uiticer/Cle FLOKLA, Deputy "t BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk. B Heather Floree PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Prime Healthcare Services - Centinela, LLC DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Bonita Finney and Angela Gordon CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER: (Check one): (1: uNLiiTeD case (7) umitep case BC684166 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) nl) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: py Date: 08/14/2018 Time: 8:30 AM Dept: 40 Divi Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [1 Notice of intentto Appear by Telephone, by (name): rank INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): Dm This statement is submitted by party (name): Prime Healthcare Services - Centinela, LLC b. EJ: This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 11/20/2017 The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 2/15/2018 Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, nave appeared, or have been dismissed. b CI The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) (1 have not been served (specify names and explain why nol). (2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names). (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): . CI The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served) Description:of case a. Type of case in [77] complaint [=] cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action). Complaint on Rejected Creditor's Claim with causes of action for: (1) breach of contract; (2) common count for services rendered; (3) account stated; and (4) open book account. = Page 1 of 6 Fm Ado for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘Cal, Rules of Coun, ‘nes 3,720-3,730 “GMATIO (Rev duly 12011) wwrw.courts.ca.gov