On November 20, 2017 a
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -
was filed
involving a dispute between
Prime Healthcare Services Centinela Llc,
and
Bonita Finney And Angela Gordon As,
Finney Bonita,
Gordon Angela,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
4
* onicitiel
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address}: FOR COURT
USE ONLY
CM-110.
Kevin T. Meade SBN:195349
The Amin Law Group
2211 Michelson Drive, Suite 1270, Irvine CA 92612
TevepHoneNo; 949-502-7715 FAX NO.(Options): 949-266-8406
FILED
E-MAIL ADORESS (Optons): kmeade@talglaw.com Superior Court of California
County of Fas Angeles
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Prime Healthcare Services - Centinela, LLC
‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
street aporess: 111 North Hill Street JUL 272018
maiune aooress: 111 North Hill Street
city AND zip cove: Los Angeles, CA 90012
Sherri kK. Cass, cacuutive uiticer/Cle
FLOKLA, Deputy
"t
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk. B
Heather Floree
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Prime Healthcare Services - Centinela, LLC
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Bonita Finney and Angela Gordon
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): (1: uNLiiTeD case (7) umitep case BC684166
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
nl)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
py
Date: 08/14/2018 Time: 8:30 AM Dept: 40 Divi Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[1 Notice of intentto Appear by Telephone, by (name): rank
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
Dm
This statement is submitted by party (name): Prime Healthcare Services - Centinela, LLC
b. EJ: This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 11/20/2017
The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 2/15/2018
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, nave appeared, or have been dismissed.
b CI The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) (1 have not been served (specify names and explain why nol).
(2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names).
(3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
. CI The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served)
Description:of case
a. Type
of case in [77] complaint [=] cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action).
Complaint on Rejected Creditor's Claim with causes of action for: (1) breach of contract; (2) common count for
services rendered; (3) account stated; and (4) open book account.
= Page 1 of 6
Fm Ado for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘Cal, Rules of Coun,
‘nes 3,720-3,730
“GMATIO (Rev duly 12011) wwrw.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
July 27, 2018
Case Filing Date
November 20, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.