arrow left
arrow right
  • HONGFEI QU ET AL VS HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • HONGFEI QU ET AL VS HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/10/2020 03:59 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk CIV-020 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY: STATE BAR NO: NAME: Belinda M. Vega (SBN 208236) / Matthew M. Busch (SBN 307396) FIRM NAME: VENABLE LLP STREET ADDRESS: 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2300 CITY: Los Angeles STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 229-9900 FAX NO. (if available): (310) 229-9901 E-MAIL ADDRESS (if available): BMVega@Venable.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant Las Vegas Resort Holdings, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: Los Angeles 90012 CITY AND ZIP CODE: Stanley Mosk Courthouse - Central District BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Hongfei Qu, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Henry Global Consulting, et al. CASE NUMBER: NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE BC685035 1. Party intending to appear by telephone is Plaintiff/Petitioner (name): Defendant/Respondent (name): Las Vegas Resort Holdings, LLC Other (name): 2. The conference, hearing, or proceeding is for (describe): Order to Show Cause set on (date): August 13, 2020 at (time): 8:30 a.m. in (department): 30 before (name of judicial officer, if known): Hon. Barbara M. Scheper Date: August 10, 2020 Belinda M. Vega ► (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE) See Code of Civil Procedure section 367.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.670 to determine if a conference, hearing, or proceeding is one generally considered appropriate for telephone appearance. Note that a court may determine on a hearing-by-hearing basis that a personal appearance is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 367.5(c).) This form is intended only to provide written notice to a court and parties as provided in rule 3.670(h) of the California Rules of Court. Check with the court to determine how to make arrangements for telephone services for an appearance either directly with the court or through a court-appointed vendor. Read California Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h) to determine when you have to file and serve notice of the intent to appear by telephone. There are different deadlines depending upon the circumstances: (1) On a regularly noticed hearing, notice must be given at least two court days before the appearance (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(1)(B)) or, after receiving notice that another party will be appearing telephonically, by noon on the court day before the appearance (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(2)). (2) On an ex parte application, notice must be given by an applicant by 10:00 a.m. two court days before the hearing (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(3)(B)). Any party other than an applicant may give notice by 2:00 p.m. or the "close of business" (as that term is defined in rule 2.251) whichever is earlier, on the court day before an ex parte appearance. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(4).) Page 1 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Civil Procedure, § 367.5; Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670 CIV-020 [Rev. January 1, 2016] American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com