arrow left
arrow right
  • HONGFEI QU ET AL VS HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • HONGFEI QU ET AL VS HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/20/2022 03:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk 1 MARTIN B. GREENBAUM, ESQ. – CSB NO. 045268 STEPHEN J. SHUMLAS, ESQ. – CSB No. 317448 2 GREENBAUM LAW GROUP LLP 3 160 Newport Center Drive, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 4 Telephone: (949) 760-1400 Facsimile: (949) 760-1300 5 6 Attorneys for Judgment Creditor, SLS TRANCHE 1 LENDER, LLC 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY LOS ANGELES 9 STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 10 HONGFEI QU, et al, ) Case No.: BC685035 11 ) Plaintiffs, ) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE 12 ) APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO QUASH vs. ) AND RECALL WRIT OF EXECUTION 13 ) HENRY GLOBBAL CONSULTING; ) Date: October 21, 2022 14 et al. ) Time: 8:30 a.m. 15 ) Dept. 30 Defendants. ) Judge: Honorable Barbara M. Scheper 16 ) 17 ) ________________________________ 18 19 Judgment Creditor SLS TRANCHE 1 LENDER, LLC submits the following 20 opposition to Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for Order to Quash and Recall Writ of 21 Execution. 22 INTRODUCTION 23 Attached as Exhibit 1 to the accompanying Declaration of Martin B. Greenbaum is a 24 true and correct copy of the Judgment entered in this case as of September 23, 2021. 25 Judgment Creditor SLS TRANCHE 1 LENDER, LLC invites the Court’s reference to the facts 26 stated therein. The Judgment results from an arbitration award. The arbitration was 27 commenced by the parties shown in the Judgment as Plaintiffs but who are now Judgment 28 Debtors. The Judgment recites (in Paragraph 1 thereof) that three arbitrators ruled against all ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO QUASH AND RECALL WRIT OF EXECUTION