arrow left
arrow right
  • HONGFEI QU ET AL VS HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • HONGFEI QU ET AL VS HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/20/2022 03:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk 1 MARTIN B. GREENBAUM, ESQ. – CSB NO. 045268 STEPHEN J. SHUMLAS, ESQ. – CSB No. 317448 2 GREENBAUM LAW GROUP LLP 3 160 Newport Center Drive, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 4 Telephone: (949) 760-1400 Facsimile: (949) 760-1300 5 6 Attorneys for Judgment Creditor, SLS TRANCHE 1 LENDER, LLC 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY LOS ANGELES 9 STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 10 HONGFEI QU, et al, ) Case No.: BC685035 11 ) Plaintiffs, ) DECLARATION OF MARTIN B. 12 ) GREENBAUM IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION vs. ) TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION 13 ) FOR ORDER TO QUASH AND RECALL WRIT HENRY GLOBBAL CONSULTING; ) OF EXECUTION 14 et al. ) 15 ) Date: October 21, 2022 Defendants. ) Time: 8:30 a.m. 16 ) Dept. 30 17 ) Judge: Honorable Barbara M. Scheper 18 19 I, MARTIN B. GREENBAUM, declare: 20 1. That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law before all Courts of the State of 21 California and am a partner in the firm of Greenbaum Law Group LLP, which is one of the 22 firms acting as counsel for Judgment Creditor SLS TRANCHE 1 LENDER, LLC. 23 2. If called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to the facts contained 24 herein. 25 3. Attached to this Declaration as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the 26 Judgment entered in this case as of September 23, 2021. I invite the Court’s reference to the 27 facts stated therein. The Judgment results from an arbitration award. The arbitration was 28 commenced by the parties shown in the Judgment as Plaintiffs but who are now Judgment ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION