On December 20, 2017 a
Response - RESPONSE PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY URIEL YOSSEFI SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT
was filed
involving a dispute between
Leevers Garrett D.,
Network Deposition Services Inc.,
Yossefi Nuriel,
Yossefi Uriel,
and
Network Deposition Services Inc.,
Yossefi Nuriel,
Yossefi Uriel,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/09/2021 04:08 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Parenteau,Deputy Clerk
1 Steven R. Friedman, Esq (SBN 100748)
Michael E. Friedman, Esq. (SBN 291694)
2 Law Office of Steven R. Friedman
1880 Century Park East
3 Suite 1411
Los Angeles, CA 90067
4 Phone: 310 273-2505
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant
6
7
8
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
WEST DISTRICT
11
GARRETT D. LEEVERS, an individual; ) Case Number: SC128570
12 ) Assigned to the Hon. Mark A. Young, Dept WE M
Plaintiff, )
13 vs. ) PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO THE ORDER
) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY URIEL YOSSEFI
14 NETWORK DEPOSITION SERVICES, ) SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT;
INC., a California corporation; URIEL ) DECLARATION OF GARRETT LEEVERS
15 YOSSEFI, an individual; NURIEL ) IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
YOSSEFI, an individual; and DOES 1 to )
16 100, inclusive, )
) DATE: July 13, 2021
17 Defendants. ) TIME: 8:30 AM
___________________________________ ) DEPT: WE M
18 )
AND CROSS-COMPLAINT ) Complaint Filed: December 20, 2017
19 )
)
20 )
)
21 )
22 ___________________________________ )
23
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
24
25 Plaintiff hereby submits the following Response to Defendant Uriel Yossefi’s Opposition to the
26 Court’s Order to Show Cause why he should not be found in contempt.
27
28
1
Plaintiff’s Response to Uriel Yossefi Opp to OSC
Document Filed Date
July 09, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 20, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.