On February 22, 2018 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Davis Lila,
Fortune Company Llc,
Hashemian Gita,
Hashemian Hassan,
Hashemian Mehdi,
Hashemian Mersedeh,
Sanders Shahla,
Younesi David,
Younesi Saeed,
and
10801 National Llc,
Rahban Frank,
Rahban Frank Aka Farhad Rahban,
Ventura Investment Company Llc,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
¢ ev ” .
CM-015
‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
L_ Richard I. Arshonsky, Esq. (SBN 155624) ,
Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz, LLP
15303 Ventura Boulevard +
Suite 1650 FILE
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 ‘Su rior Court of California
FAXNO. (Optionay: (818) 382-3433 county of Los Angeles
TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 382-3434
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): rarshonsky@laklawyers.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs MAR 01 2018
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ficarClerk of Court
street aooress: 111 North Hill Street [Sherri R. Carpe,
By. Deputy
MAILING ADDRESS:
ciryanp zip cove: Los Angeles, CA 90012
arancH name: Central District
LAINTIFF/PETITIONER: HASSAN HASHEMIAN, as Trustee of the Hashemian ICASE NUMBER:
Revocable Family Trust dated September 21, 1989,et al BC695297
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: FRANK RAHBAN, an individual; et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER:
oePt.:
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above.
41 Title: Said Rahban, etc., et al v. Farhad Rahban, etc., et al.
Case number: BC693651
Court: same as above
[_] other state or federal court (name and address):
Department: 12
Case type: [J limited civil GQ unlimited civil probate family law other (specify):
Filing date: Feb 13, 2018
Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" [ Yes [x] No
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply):
involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property.
is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.
[1 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
Status of case:
pending
([) dismissed C3 with CI without prejudice
wo (1 disposed of by judgment
Title: Fortune Company, LLC, et al v. Rahban
Case num BC695301
Court: same as above
on {J other state or federal court (name and address):
Department: 53
Page 1 of 3
Form Approved for Optional Use sos Cal, Rules of Court, rule 3.300
Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
‘CM-015 (Rev. July 1, 2007) fQ
Document Filed Date
March 01, 2018
Case Filing Date
February 22, 2018
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 08/11/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.