arrow left
arrow right
  • HASSAN HASHEMIAN ET AL VS FRANK RAHBAN ET AL Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • HASSAN HASHEMIAN ET AL VS FRANK RAHBAN ET AL Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

wet 4 . : "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): 0 FOR COURT USE ONLY CM-110 Richard I. Arshonsky, Esq. (SBN 155624) Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz, LLP 15303 Ventura Boulevard Suite 1650 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 382-3434 FAXNO. (Optionay: (818) 382-3433 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: rarshonsky@laklawyers.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name). Plaintiffs Sua wit ED an SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Cc ountv af Los Angeles ia street aopress: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: city ann zip cove: Los Angeles, CA 90012 ‘JUL 18 2018 srancu Name; Central District Sherri iR. Carter, Wve Uti lerk of Court PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: HASSAN HASHEMIAN, as Trustee of the Hashemian | By, Revocable Family Trust dated Septembe » Deputy DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:FRANK HBAN, an individual; et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): Gc] UNLIMITED CASE (J unite case BC695297 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: August 8, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 19 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): {—] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): Hassan & Medhi Hashemian, as Trustees of Hahemian Family Trust, Gita Hashemian, a. ([X_] This statement is submitted by party (name): Mersedeh Hashemian; Fortune Company, LLC and David Younesi b. [__] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a The complaint was filed on (date): February 22, 2018 b. [_] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [_] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [J have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. [£)_ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint [J cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): ay Six causes of action: (Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (2) Fraudulent Concealment; (3) Breach of Contract; (4) Breach n Pe of Implied Covenant of Good Faith, etc.; (5) Accounting; (6) Accounting. uo ~~ he oe ee Page 1 of § Fanta lopted for Mandatory Use Judital Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, tulos 3.720-3.730 (CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011) schffins