arrow left
arrow right
  • HASSAN HASHEMIAN ET AL VS FRANK RAHBAN ET AL Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • HASSAN HASHEMIAN ET AL VS FRANK RAHBAN ET AL Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/18/2019 04:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, anr:Jaddress): FOR COURT USE ONLY Richard I. Arshonsky, Esq. (SBN 155624) Helen Kim Colindres, Esq. (SBN 205301) Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz, LLP 15303 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1650 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 382-3434 FAX NO. {Optional): (818) 382-3433 E-MAIL ADDREss (Optional): hcolindres@laklawyers.com ATTORNEY FOR INameJ: Plaintiffs Fortune Comoanv. LLC and David Y ounesi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES sTREET ADDREss: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: c1TY AND z1P coDE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:HASSAN HASHEMIAN, as Trustee of the Hashemian Revocable Family Trust dated Septembe DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:FRANK RAHBAN, an individual; et al. CASE NUMBER: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Check one): [iJ UNLIMITED CASE CJ LIMITED CASE BC695297 Related to Case Nos.: (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 BC693651 & BC695301 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: May 2, 2019 Time: 8:30a.m. Dept.: 78 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): LJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. [i] This statement is submitted by party (name): Fortune Company, LLC and David Younesi b. LJ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): Second Amended Complaint filed on November 15, 2018 b. LJ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [i] All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. LJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) LJ have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) LJ have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) LJ have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. LJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in I x I complaint LJ cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Six causes of action: ( 1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (2) Fraudulent Concealment; (3) Breach of Contract; ( 4) Breach oflmplied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (5) Accountingand (6) Accounting. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT soful¥~s­ rules 3.720-3.730 L@.Plus