On February 22, 2018 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Davis Lila,
Fortune Company Llc,
Hashemian Gita,
Hashemian Hassan,
Hashemian Mehdi,
Hashemian Mersedeh,
Sanders Shahla,
Younesi David,
Younesi Saeed,
and
10801 National Llc,
Rahban Frank,
Rahban Frank Aka Farhad Rahban,
Ventura Investment Company Llc,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/18/2019 04:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, anr:Jaddress): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Richard I. Arshonsky, Esq. (SBN 155624)
Helen Kim Colindres, Esq. (SBN 205301)
Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz, LLP
15303 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1650
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 382-3434 FAX NO. {Optional): (818) 382-3433
E-MAIL ADDREss (Optional): hcolindres@laklawyers.com
ATTORNEY FOR INameJ: Plaintiffs Fortune Comoanv. LLC and David Y ounesi
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
sTREET ADDREss: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
c1TY AND z1P coDE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Central District
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:HASSAN HASHEMIAN, as Trustee of the Hashemian
Revocable Family Trust dated Septembe
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:FRANK RAHBAN, an individual; et al.
CASE NUMBER:
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
(Check one): [iJ UNLIMITED CASE CJ LIMITED CASE BC695297 Related to Case Nos.:
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 BC693651 & BC695301
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: May 2, 2019 Time: 8:30a.m. Dept.: 78 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
LJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. [i] This statement is submitted by party (name): Fortune Company, LLC and David Younesi
b. LJ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): Second Amended Complaint filed on November 15, 2018
b. LJ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. [i] All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. LJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) LJ have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) LJ have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) LJ have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. LJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in I x I complaint LJ cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Six causes of action: ( 1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (2) Fraudulent Concealment; (3) Breach of Contract; ( 4)
Breach oflmplied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (5) Accountingand (6) Accounting.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
soful¥~s rules 3.720-3.730
L@.Plus
Document Filed Date
April 18, 2019
Case Filing Date
February 22, 2018
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 08/11/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.