arrow left
arrow right
  • HASSAN HASHEMIAN ET AL VS FRANK RAHBAN ET AL Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • HASSAN HASHEMIAN ET AL VS FRANK RAHBAN ET AL Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY ROBERT W. BARNES (SBN 93483) SANDRA KHALILI (SBN 187809) RESCH POLSTER & BERGER LLP 1840 CENTURY PARK EAST, 17TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 277-8300 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 552-3209 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): skhalili@rpblaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Farhad Rahban aka Frank Rahban SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, California 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Hassan Hashemian, et al. BC695297 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Farhad Rahban aka Frank Rahban JUDICIAL OFFICER: DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: In the Matter of the Roohollah Testamentary Trust b. Case number: 18STPB01411 c. Court: same as above other state or federal court (name and address): Electronically Received 02/19/2020 04:33 PM d. Department: 2D e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): f. Filing date: February 13, 2018 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: Said Rahban, etc., et al. v. Farhad Rahban, etc., et al. b. Case number: BC693651 c. Court: same as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: 78 Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com