On October 17, 2022 a
Conference
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rincon, Cristian,
Rincon, Gladys E,
and
Does 1 Through 10,
General Motors Llc,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
82q
. .
. , _
.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUTATTORNEY: STATE BAR NUMBER Reserved fur Clerk's FileStamp
Kevin Y. Jacobson, Esq. (SBN 320532) 320532
Quill 8: Arrow, LLP
10900 Wilshire B1vd., Suite 300, Los Angeles CA 90024 ,‘.. .
‘_
TELEPHONE No.: (310) 9334271 a
4““
é L
E-MAIL ADDREss:kjacobson@&ui11arrowlaw.com TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE DATE: jugust 22, 2023 >UPERIOR COuRT OF
G13 YsE- RmCO Ct a1 UNLIMITED CASE; x
CALIFORNIA
ATTORNEY F0R(Name): ““- COUNTY OF SAN BBWNAHDINQ
FAX NOV (Optional): (310) 889—0645 LWHTED CASE: SAN BERNARWNO mSTRIC‘r
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JUL 2
COURTHOUSEADDRESS‘ 1 2023
‘ '
247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415 q
PLAINTIFF: Gladys E. Rinco et
DEFENDANT: General Motors LLC
a1
By
KAUSKA
Cw r
g
r
,_\
I
CASE NUMBER:
INITIAL TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE STATEMENT CIVSB2224248
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. This document must be filed and
served at least 15 davs prior to the trial settinq conference date.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Gladys E. Rinco et a1 ‘
.77 .
b.
D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): (g;
r
‘
~ ,.
- \
,
2. Service of Complaint on a” parties has has not D been completed.
3. Service of Cross-Complaint on all parties has D has not D been completed.
4. Description of case in Complaint:
Plaintiffpurchased a used 2017 Chevrolet Camaro from and manufactured by Defendant. Plaintiff delivered the vehicle to Defendant's authorized repair facilities multiple
times and Defendant failed to repair the vehicle after a reasonable number of opportunities Defendant violated the Song-Beverly Consumer WarrantyAct by not replacing the
vehicle 0r repurchasing flae vehicle after a reasonable number of opportunities.
5. Description of case in Cross-Complaint:
6. Has all discovery been completed: Yes D No Date discovery anticipated to be completed: Per COde
7. Do you agree to mediation? Yes No D Please check type agreed to: Private: X Court-sponsored:
8. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination: Please attach a Notice of Related Case.
D Amotionto D consolidate D Trialdates requested:YesD No D Available dates: Time
estimate:
9. Other issues:
D The following additional matters are requested to be considered by the Court:
10. Meet and Confer:
The parties represent that they have met and conferred on all subjects required by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.724.
U The panies have entered into the following stipulation(s):
11. Total number of pages attached (ifany):
| am completely familiar with this case and wil! be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as
other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the Initial Trial Setting 1
Conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: Iuly 21, 2023
Kevin Y. Jacobson, Esq.
(TYPE 0R PRINT NAME)
“MM
(SIGNATLW m? PARTY 0R ATTORNEY
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY
Fem # 13—09001—360
RCV‘MOZO Mandatory INITIAL TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party t0 the within action. My business address is 10900 Wilshire B1Vd., Suite 300, Los
Angeles, CA 90024.
On July 21, 2023, I served the following document(s) described as:
\OWQONUIJ>LDN
INITIAL TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
That document was served 0n parties herein in this proceeding by placing true copies 0fthe original
in enclosed, sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows:
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
[](BY of QUILL & ARROW, LLP, in
MAIL) I am “readily familiar” With the practices
10 collecting and processing correspondence and documents for mailing. Under that practice,
documents for mailing would be deposited with the US Postal Service 0n that same day this
11 affidavit is signed with postage fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of
business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal
12 cancellation date is more than 1-day after the day of deposit for mailing the affidavit. [CCP §
1013]
13
14 [] (BY OVERNIGHT MAIL) I am “readily familiar” with the practices of the QUILL &
ARROW, LLP, for collection and processing 0f documents for mailing via overnight delivery. I
15 caused such document(s) to be placed in a sealed envelope designated by the overnight service
carrier, addressed to the person(s) 0n whom it is to be served pursuant to the attached service list,
16 and deposited said envelope in a box or other facility regularly maintained by the overnight
service carrier with delivery fees paid or provided for. [CCP § 1013(0)]
17
[X] (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) I caused the document(s) to be transmitted by electronic mail
18 to the e-mail addresses for each party indicated on the attached service list.
[] (BY PERSONAL DELIVERY)
19 I caused to be delivered such envelope by hand to the
addressee at the address indicated 0n the attached service list.
20
21
I declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws 0f the State of California that the foregoing is
22 true and correct.
23 Executed on July 212 2023.
/s/Raguel McDonald
24 Raguel McDonald
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Document Filed Date
July 21, 2023
Case Filing Date
October 17, 2022
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.