arrow left
arrow right
  • ISAAC ANIMASHAUN VS TARGET CORPORATION ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ISAAC ANIMASHAUN VS TARGET CORPORATION ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/25/2019 08:47 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Perez,Deputy Clerk CM-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namo, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY SNYDER BURNETT EGERER, LLP Sean R. Burnett (SB# 227952) / Jessica Farley (SB# 280123) 5383 Hollister Ave., Suite 240, Santa Barbara, California 93111 TeLepHone no. 805.692.2800 FAX NO. (Optional): 805.692.2801 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: Sburnett@sbelaw.com / jfarley@sbelaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Target Corporation SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES street aooress: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: cry np zip cone: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ISAAC ANIMASHAUN DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TARGET CORPORATION et al CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): (2) uNtimitep case [-) uimitep case BC686591 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: May 9, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 26 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [2] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Jessica Farley INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. [1] This statement is submitted by party (name): Target Corporation b. [1] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): by (t]he cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a [7 al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [-] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) (1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) (1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. [-] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Violation of Unruh Civil Rights Act, False Arrest, Negligent and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Page 10f 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rules of Court, ‘nes 3.720-3.730 Gattoteon day zor www .courts.ca.gov