On December 12, 2017 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Animashaun Isaac,
and
Hevedia Daniel,
Target Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/25/2019 08:47 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Perez,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namo, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT
USE ONLY
SNYDER BURNETT EGERER, LLP
Sean R. Burnett (SB# 227952) / Jessica Farley (SB# 280123)
5383 Hollister Ave., Suite 240, Santa Barbara, California 93111
TeLepHone no. 805.692.2800 FAX NO. (Optional): 805.692.2801
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: Sburnett@sbelaw.com / jfarley@sbelaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Target Corporation
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
street aooress: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
cry np zip cone: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ISAAC ANIMASHAUN
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TARGET CORPORATION et al
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): (2) uNtimitep case [-) uimitep case BC686591
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: May 9, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 26 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[2] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Jessica Farley
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [1] This statement is submitted by party (name): Target Corporation
b. [1] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
by (t]he cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a [7 al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [-] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) (1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) (1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. [-] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Violation of Unruh Civil Rights Act, False Arrest, Negligent and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Page 10f 5
Form Adopted
for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rules of Court,
‘nes 3.720-3.730
Gattoteon day zor www .courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
April 25, 2019
Case Filing Date
December 12, 2017
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Case Voided) 01/22/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.