arrow left
arrow right
  • ISAAC ANIMASHAUN VS TARGET CORPORATION ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ISAAC ANIMASHAUN VS TARGET CORPORATION ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/24/2019 03:15 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 SNYDER BURNETT EGERER, LLP Sean R. Burnett (SB# 227952) 2 Jessica Farley (SB# 280123) 5383 Hollister Avenue, Suite 240 3 Santa Barbara, California 93111 Telephone No.: 805.692.2800 4 Facsimile No.: 805.692.2801 sburnett@sbelaw.com 5 jfarley@sbelaw.com 6 Attorney for Defendants TARGET CORPORATION and DANIEL HEREDIA 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 ISAAC ANIMASHAUN Case No. BC686591 12 Plaintiff, Hon. Elaine Lu, Department 26 13 v. DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO 14 TARGET CORPORATION, a corporation, PLAINTIFF’S UNVERIFIED FIRST DANIEL HEVEDIA, an individual, and DOES AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 1-100 16 Defendants. [Complaint filed: December 12, 2017] ______________________________________/ 17 18 19 Defendants TARGET CORPORATION and DANIEL HEREDIA (erroneously sued as 20 Daniel Hevedia) (“answering defendants”), for themselves alone and no other defendant, answer 21 the unverified First Amended Complaint of plaintiff ISAAC ANIMASHAUN and admit, deny, 22 aver, and allege as follows: 23 Pursuant to Section 431.30(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, these answering defendants 24 deny each and every allegation of the First Amended Complaint, and each cause of action and 25 each and every part thereof, including a denial that plaintiff has been or will be injured or 26 damaged, whether in the manner alleged, or in any other manner or sum, or at all. 27 The following affirmative defenses are asserted on the basis that they are likely to have 28 evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. SNYDER BURNETT 1 EGERER, LLP 5383 Hollister Avenue Suite 240 DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S UNVERIFIED FIRST AMENDED Santa Barbara, CA 93111 COMPLAINT