arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIA V MALDONADO VS JW MARRIOTT LOS ANGELES LA LIVE ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARIA V MALDONADO VS JW MARRIOTT LOS ANGELES LA LIVE ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ORIGINAL Kevin A. Lipeles (Bar No. 244275) kevin@kallaw.com ae Thomas H. Schelly (Bar No. 217285) F thomas@kallaw.com Superior Court of Califomia LIPELES LAW GROUP, APC untv of Los Anaeles 880 Apollo Street, Suite 336 El Segundo, California 90245 DEC 19 2017 Telephone: (310) 322-2211 SherriR. xecutive Officer/Clerk Fax: (310) 322-2252 By. s in Attorneys for Plaintiff, MARIA V. MALDONADO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 MARIA V. MALDONADO, an individual, Case No. BC 6873838 11 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: 12 Vv. 1. DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION; 13 JW MARRIOTT LOS ANGELES L.A. 2. FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN THE 14 LIVE, a company of unknown organization; INTERACTIVE PROCESS; MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a 3. WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN 15 Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY 100, inclusive, 16 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. 17 18 19 20 MARIA V. MALDONADO alleges the following: 21 I 22 PARTIES i wes 23 1 Plaintiff MARIA V. MALDONADO (“Plaintiff”) is an employee of Defendants and, tem we 24 all times relevant to the matters alleged herein, has been a resident of Los Angeles County. ty, oe 2 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant JW et iw 25 od 26 MARRIOTT LOS ANGELES L.A. LIVE (“MLA”) is a company of unknown organization. 27 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges MLA is authorized to do business and is doing 28 business in the city of Los Angeles, State of California. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL