arrow left
arrow right
  • MY LE MAI VS MICHELLE NGUYEN Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MY LE MAI VS MICHELLE NGUYEN Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Q E S; - ~ .. __ _ :* L‘; '~ "" ' CM-1 10 ' ATTORNEY on PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Peter J. Howell (SBN 227636) / V. Thai Phan (SBN 310176) RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 611 Anton BIvd., Fourteenth Floor 3; Costa Mesa, CA 92626 TELEPHONE NO.: 714- 641 -51 O0 FAX No. (optional; 714-546-9035 Superior Conn of California E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): phoweI|@rut_an.com / tphan@rutan.com County of Los A083“ monuev ma (Name): My Le Mat 8. Cammie Myhieu Phan SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 21 if STREETADDRESS: 400 Civic Center Plaza ‘ Off ‘ /Clerk MAILING ADDRESS: Shem R‘ Caner’ Exccumc Ker D t CITY AND ZIP CODE: Pomona, CA 91766 By °p" 3' I‘.- ., , . BRANCH NAME: EAST DISTRICT “°“‘ ~s PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: MY LE MAI and CAMMIE MYHIEU PHAN DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: MICHELLE NGUYEN ' . CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE "UMBER fl.-A “' KC069769 i= (Check one): IX UNLIMITED CASE E] LIMITED CASE 3 . (Amount demanded ' (Amount demanded is $25,000 i_‘_.; < exceeds $25,000) or less) A’ CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: April 5, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: EA J Div.: Room: ' Q) - Address of court (if different from the address above): X D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): 4 I INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specied information must be provided. V 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. C] This statement is submitted by party (name): _ b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Plaintiffs My Le Mai and Cammie Myhieu Phan and :v._._:_g Defendant Michelle Nguyen 3:‘-_' R 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was led on (date): November 3, 2017 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was led on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross—compIaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint’ (1) [:I have not been served (specify names and explain why not): V (2) D have been sewed but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) C] have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. E] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case - ‘ a. Type of case in IE complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): (1) FRAUD; (2) CONVERSION; (3) UNJUST ENRICHMENT; and (4) MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED v Pan 1 of 5 ,f}g, F°'jf,,‘,},‘;‘j,‘,",§",;u’,‘};,{"f,‘}'g’,j‘,§§{.‘{n}f,‘° CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ' °§‘l:-,e‘;“:‘,‘.’;2‘{.'_‘\?,f’;‘3‘§ _- .,l CM-110 (Rev. July 1. 2011] ' wwvv.nouris.ca.gov «ea I