On December 04, 2017 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Stonebraker Dana,
and
Jaguar Land Rover North America Llc,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address). ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY
Robert L. Starr, Esq. (SBN 183052)
23901 Calabasas Road, Suite 2072
Calabasas, California 91302
TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 225-9040 FAX NO. (Optional): (84 8) 225-9042
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): robert@starrlaw.com
FILED
Superior Court of California
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff, DANA STONEBRAKER County of Los Angeles
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
street aooress: 111 North Hill Street MAR 15 2016
MAILING ADDRESS: Sherri R. Carter, Executive Vificer/Clerk *
CiTy AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012 By. » Deputy
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse Moses Soto
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DANA STONEBRAKER
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [5 ute case BC685419
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: April 4, 2018 Time: 8:30am Dept.: 32 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[) Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [2] This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff, DANA STONEBRAKER
b. [] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date): December 4, 2017
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b CI The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
be (3) (1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
pe
ae CI The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
peo
“Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint Co) cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of Implied Warranty, Breach of Express Warranty, Violation of the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act
relating to a lease of a new motor vehicle.
Page 1 of §
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California ules 3,720-3.730
‘CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
March 15, 2018
Case Filing Date
December 04, 2017
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/19/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.