On December 04, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Stonebraker Dana,
and
Jaguar Land Rover North America Llc,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
5a
Fe
(
Reserved for Clerk's Filing Stamp
SUPERIOR COurT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LED ou
COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Herne a of California
arelon
111 N. Hill St.,
PLAINTIFF:
Los Angeles, Ca. 90012
APR 0.4 2018
anal
Lina Ohnébaker
Sp.
By. Deputy
DEFENDANT:
Mount Lond over furth Ament. Ue
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER “ECLISUD
41 Case Management Conference
oO The parties have complied with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq., and have filed case management statements on Judicial
Council form CM-110.
oO The case management conference is continued to at 8:30 a.m. or
a.m. oO p.m. due to one or both parties' non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule
3.720 et seq is ordered to show cause at said conference
why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq
2. Parties
L] There [J is (is not [] wilt be a cross-complaint(s) in this matter.
O All named Defendants/Cross-Defendants have been served and have appeared, been defaulted or dismissed.
J Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal,
should not be imposed for failure to cause entry of Default/Default Judgment.
With the agreement of Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant, all unserved Defendants/Cross-Defendants and Does/Roes are
dismissed/severed as of
oO Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be
imposed for failure to serve a defendant/cross-defendant in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq
3. Alternative Dispute Resolution
(_] The case is ([_] referred [] ordered] to ((] arbitration [] mediation [1] neutral evaluation]
C2 Voluntary settlement conference through [[_] court serviceseT7p neutral]. (See L.A.S.C. Local Rules, Chapter 12.)
The ADR process must be completed by (- £7
oO A post-ADR status conference is set for
wf lub
et)
° 1 Paint /Defendant has demanded jury and will ost juny fees. (Code Civ. Proc., § 631.)
[YA final status conference is set for at 8:30 a.m. or at Clam. Cpm
The case is set for jury/cous trial on at Je Lam p.m.
(Time estimated for trial is » days.
oO The identity of trial counsel is: Oo set forth in parties' case management statements (form CM-110):
oO as follows: For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
5. Other Issues
CJ Pursuant to oO stipulation Oo court order, the case is reclassified to limited jurisdiction
There is a potentially related case, number See further order below.
A mandatory settlement conference per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380, is set for
~ at a.m. oO p.m. The parties are ordered to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380.
[The court further orders as follows:
me
Notice-|
oe
is waived oO shall be given by Plaintiff/Defendant Oo has been given by junsel in open court.
Dated: _ 7 Y- 1% : EL S. MURPHY
Judicial Officer
LACIV 134 (Rev. 04/09) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq.
LASC Approved 09-03
DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL - COURT FILE COPIES - PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS
Document Filed Date
April 04, 2018
Case Filing Date
December 04, 2017
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/19/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
5a Fe ( Reserved for Clerk's Filing Stamp SUPERIOR COurT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LED ou COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Herne a of California arelon 111 N. Hill St., PLAINTIFF: Los Angeles, Ca. 90012 APR 0.4 2018 anal Lina Ohnébaker Sp. By. Deputy DEFENDANT: Mount Lond over furth Ament. Ue CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER “ECLISUD 41 Case Management Conference oO The parties have complied with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq., and have filed case management statements on Judicial Council form CM-110. oO The case management conference is continued to at 8:30 a.m. or a.m. oO p.m. due to one or both parties' non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq is ordered to show cause at said conference why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq 2. Parties L] There [J is (is not [] wilt be a cross-complaint(s) in this matter. O All named Defendants/Cross-Defendants have been served and have appeared, been defaulted or dismissed. J Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be imposed for failure to cause entry of Default/Default Judgment. With the agreement of Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant, all unserved Defendants/Cross-Defendants and Does/Roes are dismissed/severed as of oO Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be imposed for failure to serve a defendant/cross-defendant in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq 3. Alternative Dispute Resolution (_] The case is ([_] referred [] ordered] to ((] arbitration [] mediation [1] neutral evaluation] C2 Voluntary settlement conference through [[_] court serviceseT7p neutral]. (See L.A.S.C. Local Rules, Chapter 12.) The ADR process must be completed by (- £7 oO A post-ADR status conference is set for wf lub et) ° 1 Paint /Defendant has demanded jury and will ost juny fees. (Code Civ. Proc., § 631.) [YA final status conference is set for at 8:30 a.m. or at Clam. Cpm The case is set for jury/cous trial on at Je Lam p.m. (Time estimated for trial is » days. oO The identity of trial counsel is: Oo set forth in parties' case management statements (form CM-110): oO as follows: For Plaintiff: For Defendant: 5. Other Issues CJ Pursuant to oO stipulation Oo court order, the case is reclassified to limited jurisdiction There is a potentially related case, number See further order below. A mandatory settlement conference per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380, is set for ~ at a.m. oO p.m. The parties are ordered to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380. [The court further orders as follows: me Notice-| oe is waived oO shall be given by Plaintiff/Defendant Oo has been given by junsel in open court. Dated: _ 7 Y- 1% : EL S. MURPHY Judicial Officer LACIV 134 (Rev. 04/09) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq. LASC Approved 09-03 DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL - COURT FILE COPIES - PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS