arrow left
arrow right
  • AWI BUILDERS INC ET AL VS ALLIANT CONSULTING INC ET AL Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage tort (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • AWI BUILDERS INC ET AL VS ALLIANT CONSULTING INC ET AL Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage tort (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ 4 © ORIGINAL "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Barnumber, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY CM-110 Samuel J. Muir, Esq Michael B. McDonald, (SBN 89883) Esq (SBN 278196) FILED rior Court.of Califomia COLLINS COLLINS MUIR + STEWART LLP ounty of Los Anaeles 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700 Oakland, CA 94612 TELEPHONE No: (510) 844-5100 FAX NO. (Optional): (510) 844-5101 AUG 14 2018 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name: Defendant GKK WORKS Sherri RG pecuuve Officar/Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles By, streetaooress: 111 N. Hill Street Deputy MAILING ADDRESS: city ann zipcove: LOS Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:AWI BUILDERS, INC = DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:ALLIANT CONSULTING, INC CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE (7 umitep case BC696666 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 am exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 08/24/2018 Time: 8:30 a.m Dept.: 53 Div. Room: i Address of court (if different from the address above). [] Notice of Intent to Appear by. Telephone, by (name): i INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. ww) Party or parties (answer one): This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant GKK WORKS b. [1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a The complaint was filed on (date). b. [_] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date) Service (to be answered by plaintiffs arid cross-complainants only) . [_] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. () The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [7] have not been served (specify names and explain why not): -_— (2) (1) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) (1) have had a default entered against them (specify names). c CI The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4 Description of case @a Type of case in complaint [2 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint for Violation of 42 U.S.C 1983; Monnell Claim; Negligent Interference with Contract, Economic Opportunity; Intentional Interference with Contract, Economic Opportunity; and Negligent Supervision Page 1 of § “i Foiticadopted for Mandatory Use Cal, Rules of Court, ‘adicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘ules 3.720-3.730 *OM-110 [Rev, July1, 2011] OlULONS" is