Document for AWI BUILDERS INC ET AL VS ALLIANT CONSULTING INC ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/23/2021 05:44 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by W. Moore,Deputy Clerk
                                                                                                                                                                        CM-110
                 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITH OUT AHORNEY (Name. State Barnumber, and address): S 8 N                                              FOR COURT USE ONLY                       ,
                                                                                                  219879
                SHIRLEY R. SULLINGER, Deputy Attorney General
                O_ffice of the Attorney General, Department of Justice
                300 S. Spring Street, Suite 1702, Los Angeles, CA 90013
                                           213.269.6609
                              TELEPHONE NO.:                     FAX NO (Optional): 916. 731.2120

                                           Shirley.Sullinger@doj.ca.gov
                     E-MAIL AOORESS (Opllona1J:

                      ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant Susan Nakagama                                                                                                                  !
                  SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                   STREET AODRESS: 111 NORTH HILL STREET

                   MAILINGADDRESS: 111 NORTH HILL STREET

                  CI TY ANDZIP CODE LOS ANGELES , CA 90012

                       BRANCH NAME STAN LEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

                        PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: AWi BUILDERS , INC., ET AL.                                                            Pursuant to Govt. Code § 6103
                DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ALLIANT CONSULTING , ET AL.                                                                         EXEMPT FROM FEES
                                                                                                                                                                          -
                                                   CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT                                                  CASE NUMBER:

                (Check one):             [ZJ       UNLIMITED CASE            D        LIMITED CASE                                          BC696666
                                                   (Amount demanded                   (Amount demanded is $25,000
                                                   exceeds $25,000)                   or less)

                A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
                Date:             April 6, 2021                 Time:       8:30 a.m.         Dept.: 53                    Div.:                         Room:
                Address of court (if different from the address above):

                 [ZJ         Notice of Intent to Appear by Tele phone, by (name): Shirley R. Sullinger

                                  INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
                1.     Party or parties (answer one):
                        a.   [L] This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant Susan Nakagama
                        b.   CJ        This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):


                2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
                        a.    T he complaint was filed on (date):
                        b.    CJ · The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
                3.      Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
                        a.    CJ       All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
                        b.    CJ       The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
                                       (1)    D       have not been served (specify names and explain why not):

                                       (2)    D       have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):

                                       (3)    D       have had a default entered against them (specify names):

                        c.    D        The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
                                       they may be served):



                4.      Descri ption of case
                        a.  Type of case in         W      complaint       D        cross-complaint           (Describe, including causes of action):
                               Plaintiffs allege 42 USC section 1983 against Susan Nakagama, an employee of Division of Labor Standards
                               Enforcement.
                                                                                                                                                                              Pa e 1 of S
                Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
                  Judicial Council of California
                                                                       CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT                                                                    Cal. Rules of Court.
                                                                                                                                                                     rules 3. 720-3.730
                   CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011 )                                                                                                                      www.courts.ca.gov