On March 14, 2018 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Smith Stephanie,
and
Palisades News,
Pascoe. Sue,
Sanderson Matt,
Sue Pascoe.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
1 JASSY VICK CAROLAN LLP
JEAN-PAUL JASSY, Cal. Bar No. 205513
2 jpjassy@jassyvick.com
ELIZABETH BALDRIDGE, Cal. Bar No. 313390
3 ebaldridge@jassyvick.com
800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800
4 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: 310-870-7048
5 Facsimile: 310-870-7010
6 Attorneys for Defendants
Palisades News, Sue Pascoe and Matt Sanderson
7
8
9
10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
12
13 STEPHANIE SMITH, an individual, Case No. SC128999
Electronically Received 02/10/2020 11:26 AM
14 Plaintiff, Assigned to Hon. Marc D. Gross
Department R
15 vs.
16 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
PALISADES NEWS, entity type unknown; OF ENTIRE ACTION FOLLOWING
SUE PASCOE, an individual; MATT REMAND FROM COURT OF APPEAL
17 SANDERSON, an individual; and DOES 1
through 50,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION
Document Filed Date
March 10, 2020
Case Filing Date
March 14, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 JASSY VICK CAROLAN LLP JEAN-PAUL JASSY, Cal. Bar No. 205513 2 jpjassy@jassyvick.com ELIZABETH BALDRIDGE, Cal. Bar No. 313390 3 ebaldridge@jassyvick.com 800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800 4 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: 310-870-7048 5 Facsimile: 310-870-7010 6 Attorneys for Defendants Palisades News, Sue Pascoe and Matt Sanderson 7 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 13 STEPHANIE SMITH, an individual, Case No. SC128999 Electronically Received 02/10/2020 11:26 AM 14 Plaintiff, Assigned to Hon. Marc D. Gross Department R 15 vs. 16 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL PALISADES NEWS, entity type unknown; OF ENTIRE ACTION FOLLOWING SUE PASCOE, an individual; MATT REMAND FROM COURT OF APPEAL 17 SANDERSON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION