arrow left
arrow right
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS INNER SPACE DESIGN Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS INNER SPACE DESIGN Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

William J. Brunick, Esq. (State Bar No. 46289) fe f Leland P. McElhane State Bar No. 39257 BRUNICK, McEL 1839 Commercenter West HAN& KENNEDY, PLC RiySuant to P.O. Box 131 HieBeh hO5 San Bernardino, California 92423-3130 MAY 25 2018 Telephone: Facsimile: -Mail: ( 909909) ) 388-1889 889-8301 runick@bmklawplce.com SHEFTH He 3 _Ea spr, waccue YiuicersClerk of Court + Deputy E-Mail: Imcelhaney@bmklawplc.com Westen Pahinsan Attorneys for Plainti ff, ANTELOPE VALLE 'v-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 12 ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN 13 WATER AGENCY, a Public Agency, po707451 Case No.: 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. COMPLAINT IN EMINENT 16 Inner Space Design & Development, Inc., a California corporation; Imperial 17 Mortgage Corporation, a California corporation; Image Finance, LLC, a 18 California limited liability company; DOES | through 10, inclusive; and al 19 persons unknown claiming an interest in the property described in e complaint, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 Plaintiff, Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (hereafter, “Plaintiff”), for a 24 cause of action against the Defendants, and each of them, alleges: 25 1 Plaintiff, the Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (AVEK), a public 26 agency, is and at all times herein mentioned was a State Water Contractor empowered to 27 import State Project Water into the Antelope Valley and to store water underground for 38 ra ‘ wa : COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN ma 1 2 po on