On July 12, 2019 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ontiveros, Felix,
Valdez, Ernie,
and
Coastal Pacific Food Distributors, Inc. A California Coporation,
Coastal Pacific Food Distributors, Inc. A California Corporation,
for Employment - Complex
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
f
1 Edwin Aiwazian SBN 232943
LAWYERS for JUSTICE PC
2 410 West Arden A enue S uite 203
Glendale California 91203 q f
3 Tel 818 265 1020 w
t c
Fax 818 265 1021
A U G 21 2 19
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5 x
r
v
9
Pd
4 3
a k ii
1s
ve
IZe i i 1 a s
b
7
8 SUPERIQR CUURT OF THE STATE OF CAI IFORN A
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
F ELIX ONTIVEROS individually and on Case No J 1 9
N
behajf of other aggrieved eniployees
pursuant to the California Prxvate Attorneys COMPLAINT TOR ENFORCEMENT
2 General Act
q UNDER THE PRYVATE ATTQRI IEYS
GENERAL ACT CALIFORNIA LABOR
Plaintiff
CODE 2698 ET SEQ
1
vs
w Violation of CaIifomia Labar Code
1 COASTAL PACIFIC I O D 2698 et
seq Califomia Labor Code
DISTRIBUTORS INC a Califarnia Private Attorneys General Act of 2004
a 16 corparation and DOES 1 through 100
inclusive DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
17
Defenda nts
18
19
0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COIv7PLAINT FOR ENFORCEMENT UNDCR i IIE PRIVATG ATTORIi YS G1 NLRAL ACT r
1
CALiFORNIA LABOR CODE 2698 ET SEQ AND D MAND rQR J JRY TRIAL
1 COrME51 10W Plaintiff FELIX O1 TT TVEROS Plaintiff individually ai d on
2 belialf of ather a grieved einployees pursuattt to the California Pri vate Attorneys General
3 Act and alleges as follows
q JCTRISDICTIC3N AND VENUE
5 l This repres ntative action is br ught pursuant t4 the Ca ifornia Labc r Code
section 2C9 et seq The civil p nalties sc ught by Plaintiff exceed the minimal jurisdiction
7 limits of he Superic r
Qurt and will be established accarding a pro f at trial
8 2 This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the California
9 Gonstitutian Axticle 4 Z Section 10 wluch grants the superior court original jurisdiction in
1 Il of h er ca uses exce t tl ose giv n b sfaiute to other caurts The statutes under which this
a a
11 action zs bxought do nat speci y any other basis fpr jurisdiction
12 3 This Court h s jurisdiction over Dcfendant because upon inforrnation and
E
13 belief Defendan is a citizen of California has sufficient mir irnt m ec ntacts i Califarnia or
w
0
s
l vtherwise
intentionally avails itse v the Califc rnia market sa as tt render the exercise of
15 jurisdi tion over it by the CalifQrnia cour s cc nsistent with tra dztic nal nc tic ns of fair pla and
3
16 substantial justie
17 4 Venue is proper in this Court because upon information and belief
18 Defendant maintains c ffices has agents andfar tx ansacts busi ess in the State of California
19 including the
County af San Bernardino The majc rity F th acts nd or issicans alleged
2fl herein relating to Plaintiff a d the other aggrieved employees took place in the State of
1 Calif rnia including tlle Cc unt of San Bernaz dino
2 PAIxTIES
23 5 Plainti FFELIX C NTN R05 is an inctividual residing in the tate of
24 Califarnia Cvuzity of an Bernardino
25 6 Defendant COAS7 AL PACIFIC F 7OD DISTRIBUTORS INC at all times
26 herein mentioned was and is upan in ormafiion anci belief a California corporation and at
27 a 11 times herein rnenti iied an employer whc se ernplayees a re engaged tlarougl out the Stafie
28 c f California includin the County of Saiz Bernarciino
1
COINFLtlINT F R ENFURCGM 1 tT U1VD R TIIE PR1VA I E ATTt RNEYS G N ItAL AC T
CALiFt ItNtA LABpEt C DE t 269 C t S Q AND DkMAND FOR TURY Itt AL
Document Filed Date
August 21, 2019
Case Filing Date
July 12, 2019
Category
Employment - Complex
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
f 1 Edwin Aiwazian SBN 232943 LAWYERS for JUSTICE PC 2 410 West Arden A enue S uite 203 Glendale California 91203 q f 3 Tel 818 265 1020 w t c Fax 818 265 1021 A U G 21 2 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 x r v 9 Pd 4 3 a k ii 1s ve IZe i i 1 a s b 7 8 SUPERIQR CUURT OF THE STATE OF CAI IFORN A 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 F ELIX ONTIVEROS individually and on Case No J 1 9 N behajf of other aggrieved eniployees pursuant to the California Prxvate Attorneys COMPLAINT TOR ENFORCEMENT 2 General Act q UNDER THE PRYVATE ATTQRI IEYS GENERAL ACT CALIFORNIA LABOR Plaintiff CODE 2698 ET SEQ 1 vs w Violation of CaIifomia Labar Code 1 COASTAL PACIFIC I O D 2698 et seq Califomia Labor Code DISTRIBUTORS INC a Califarnia Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 a 16 corparation and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 17 Defenda nts 18 19 0 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COIv7PLAINT FOR ENFORCEMENT UNDCR i IIE PRIVATG ATTORIi YS G1 NLRAL ACT r 1 CALiFORNIA LABOR CODE 2698 ET SEQ AND D MAND rQR J JRY TRIAL 1 COrME51 10W Plaintiff FELIX O1 TT TVEROS Plaintiff individually ai d on 2 belialf of ather a grieved einployees pursuattt to the California Pri vate Attorneys General 3 Act and alleges as follows q JCTRISDICTIC3N AND VENUE 5 l This repres ntative action is br ught pursuant t4 the Ca ifornia Labc r Code section 2C9 et seq The civil p nalties sc ught by Plaintiff exceed the minimal jurisdiction 7 limits of he Superic r Qurt and will be established accarding a pro f at trial 8 2 This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the California 9 Gonstitutian Axticle 4 Z Section 10 wluch grants the superior court original jurisdiction in 1 Il of h er ca uses exce t tl ose giv n b sfaiute to other caurts The statutes under which this a a 11 action zs bxought do nat speci y any other basis fpr jurisdiction 12 3 This Court h s jurisdiction over Dcfendant because upon inforrnation and E 13 belief Defendan is a citizen of California has sufficient mir irnt m ec ntacts i Califarnia or w 0 s l vtherwise intentionally avails itse v the Califc rnia market sa as tt render the exercise of 15 jurisdi tion over it by the CalifQrnia cour s cc nsistent with tra dztic nal nc tic ns of fair pla and 3 16 substantial justie 17 4 Venue is proper in this Court because upon information and belief 18 Defendant maintains c ffices has agents andfar tx ansacts busi ess in the State of California 19 including the County af San Bernardino The majc rity F th acts nd or issicans alleged 2fl herein relating to Plaintiff a d the other aggrieved employees took place in the State of 1 Calif rnia including tlle Cc unt of San Bernaz dino 2 PAIxTIES 23 5 Plainti FFELIX C NTN R05 is an inctividual residing in the tate of 24 Califarnia Cvuzity of an Bernardino 25 6 Defendant COAS7 AL PACIFIC F 7OD DISTRIBUTORS INC at all times 26 herein mentioned was and is upan in ormafiion anci belief a California corporation and at 27 a 11 times herein rnenti iied an employer whc se ernplayees a re engaged tlarougl out the Stafie 28 c f California includin the County of Saiz Bernarciino 1 COINFLtlINT F R ENFURCGM 1 tT U1VD R TIIE PR1VA I E ATTt RNEYS G N ItAL AC T CALiFt ItNtA LABpEt C DE t 269 C t S Q AND DkMAND FOR TURY Itt AL