arrow left
arrow right
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS LA LIBRE ORCHARD 3 Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS LA LIBRE ORCHARD 3 Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ e William J. Brunick, Es Leland P. McElhane BRUNICK, McEL! is (State Bar No. 46289 y & KENNEDY, PLC State Bar No. 39257) Exempt from filing fee pursuant to 1839 Commercenter West Gov't. Code ei 6103 P.O. Box 131 an Bernardino, California 92423-3130 "Boutinty Court of California of Los Anneles Telephone: Facsimile: ( } 90 9) 889-8301 90 388-1889 E-Mail: bbrunic mklawplc.com SherriR. MAY 25 2018 E-Mail: lmcelhaney@bmklawplc.com uve Otficer/Cien By. — Deputy Attorneys for Plainti ff, s ANTELOPE VALLE 'v-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 12 13 ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY, a Public Agency, Case No.: BC 707584 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. COMPLAINT IN EMINENT 16 La Libre Orchard #31, LLC, a suspended limited liability company; Southern 17 ifornia Edison Company; DOES 1 ‘ough 10 inclusive; and al i l persons 18 unknown ci: aiming an interest in the property described in the complaint, 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 Plaintiff, Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (hereafter, “Plaintiff”), for a 23 cause of action against the Defendants, and each of them, alleges: 24 1 Plaintiff, the Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (AVEK), a-public 25 agency, is and at all times herein mentioned was a State Water Contractor empowered to 26 import State Project Water into the Antelope Valley and to store water underground for 27 future use by it customers, and is vested by law with authority to exercise the power of 1S 128 eminent domain to acquire private property for public use. \ mr MAL COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN ma 1 om bes ee