On March 12, 2018 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Combs Dismissed 1 10 19 Crystal Lee,
Hom Alexander Kwong Tomizo,
Rogers Gini Wong,
Navarro Kasey,
Weisberg Dismissed 1 29 19 Steven,
Weisberg Dismissed 1 29 19 Terry,
and
Combs Dismissed 1 10 19 Crystal Lee,
Hom Alexander Kwong Tomizo,
Rogers Gini Wong,
for Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/21/2020 08:28 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Lopez,Deputy Clerk
1 Walter Rodriguez, State Bar No. 131423
MARK R. WEINER & ASSOCIATES
2 Employees of the Law Department
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
3 655 North Central Avenue, 12th Floor
Glendale, California 91203-1434
4 Telephone: (818) 543-4000 / FAX: (855) 396-3606
E-Mail Address: Cali.Law-Glendale@StateFarm.com
5
6 Attorneys for defendant and cross-complainant Gini Wong
Rogers
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11 Steven Weisberg; Terry Weisberg; Kasey ) NO. BC697668
Navarro, ) Complaint Filed: March 12, 2018
12 ) Judge: Hon. Laura A.
Plaintiff, ) Seigle
13 ) Department: 27
v. ) Trial Date: March 20, 2020
14 )
Alexander Kwong Tomizo Hom; Gini Wong ) FSC: March 6, 2020
15 Rogers; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ) Time: 10:00 a.m.
) Dept.: 27
16 Defendant. )
) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE
17 _____________________________________________________________ ) NO. 3 FOR AN ORDER PROHIBITING
) PLAINTIFF FROM
18 And Related Actions ) ARGUING/IMPOSING AN IMPROPER
_____________________________________________________________ ) STANDARD OF CARE;
19 DECLARATION OF WALTER
RODRIGUEZ
20
21
22 INTRODUCTION
23
24 The issues in this case are whether or not defendant's negligence caused plaintiff's
25 claimed injuries, and the nature and extent of plaintiff's injuries and damages. Defendant
26 anticipates plaintiff will implement a trial strategy that employs irrelevant and prejudicial
27 arguments to increase her likelihood of inflating her damages. Specifically, defendant believes
28 plaintiff will argue defendant should have acted in the “safest” manner possible even though as a
-1-
DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3
Document Filed Date
February 21, 2020
Case Filing Date
March 12, 2018
Category
Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 12/16/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/21/2020 08:28 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Lopez,Deputy Clerk 1 Walter Rodriguez, State Bar No. 131423 MARK R. WEINER & ASSOCIATES 2 Employees of the Law Department State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 3 655 North Central Avenue, 12th Floor Glendale, California 91203-1434 4 Telephone: (818) 543-4000 / FAX: (855) 396-3606 E-Mail Address: Cali.Law-Glendale@StateFarm.com 5 6 Attorneys for defendant and cross-complainant Gini Wong Rogers 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 Steven Weisberg; Terry Weisberg; Kasey ) NO. BC697668 Navarro, ) Complaint Filed: March 12, 2018 12 ) Judge: Hon. Laura A. Plaintiff, ) Seigle 13 ) Department: 27 v. ) Trial Date: March 20, 2020 14 ) Alexander Kwong Tomizo Hom; Gini Wong ) FSC: March 6, 2020 15 Rogers; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ) Time: 10:00 a.m. ) Dept.: 27 16 Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE 17 _____________________________________________________________ ) NO. 3 FOR AN ORDER PROHIBITING ) PLAINTIFF FROM 18 And Related Actions ) ARGUING/IMPOSING AN IMPROPER _____________________________________________________________ ) STANDARD OF CARE; 19 DECLARATION OF WALTER RODRIGUEZ 20 21 22 INTRODUCTION 23 24 The issues in this case are whether or not defendant's negligence caused plaintiff's 25 claimed injuries, and the nature and extent of plaintiff's injuries and damages. Defendant 26 anticipates plaintiff will implement a trial strategy that employs irrelevant and prejudicial 27 arguments to increase her likelihood of inflating her damages. Specifically, defendant believes 28 plaintiff will argue defendant should have acted in the “safest” manner possible even though as a -1- DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3