Motion,Ex Parte: STEVEN WEISBERG ET AL VS ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/22/2021 05:18 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Reyna,Deputy Clerk




                         1      Steven Weisberg, Esq.(SBN 73102)
                                LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN WEISBERG
                        2       16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1180
                                Encino, CA 91436
                        3       Tel. (818)342-0180
                        4       Daniel J. Cheren, Esq.(SBN: 175475)
                                CHEREN AND ASSOCIATES
                        5       16055 Ventura Blvd., Suite 525
                                Encino, California 91436
                        6       Telephone:(818)990-7700; Fax:(818)990-9888
                        7       Attorney for Plaintiff KASEY NAVARRO
                        8                                  SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                        9                                    COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
                       10

                       11       STEVEN WEISBERG; TERRY                                               )        CASENO.:BC697668
                                WEISBERG;KASEY NAVARRO,                                              )        Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction
                      12                                                                             )
                                                                  Plaintiff(s),
                                                                  ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
                       13                                         ) FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING
                                                                  ) THE VERDICT AND NOTICE OF
                       14                                         ) INTENTION OF AND MOTION TO
                                V.                                ) VACATE THE JUDGMENT and NOTICE
                      15                                          ) OF INTENTION TO MOVE FOR A NEW
                                ALEXANDER KWONG TOMIZO HOM; ) TRIAL; DECLARATION OF DANIEL
                      16        GINI WONG ROGERS;CRYSTAL LEE ) CHEREN
                                COMBS and DOES 1 to 50,inclusive. )
                      17                                          ) Trial Date 09/21/2021 - 10/07/2021
                                                 Defendant(s)     ) Date:    March 2, 2022
                      18                                          ) Time: 8:30 AM
                                                                  ) Dept.: F-47
                      19                                          )
                                                                  ) Reservation No. 400746456231
                      20

                      21       TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

                      22                   PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 2, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. in Department F-47 of the
                      23        above-captioned Courtlocated at9425 Penfield Ave,Chatsworth,CA 91311,PlaintiffKasey Navarro
                      24       (hereinafter, PLAINTIFF) will move this Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure
                      25        Sections 629 and 663 for a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and/or Vacation of Judgment to
                      26       the extent the jury verdict and judgment found that Defendant Alexander Kwong Tomizo Horn was
                      27        not negligent.
                      28                   The motion is made on the grounds that the evidence received at trial is insufficient as a


                                                                                                          1
                                                   PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERIDCT