arrow left
arrow right
  • INEST THACKER VS. BYRON HALCROMB, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • INEST THACKER VS. BYRON HALCROMB, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/30/2020 03:24 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Rojas,Deputy Clerk Paul Orloff (SBN 216791) ORLOFF 86 ASSOCIATES APC 8402 Florence Avenue Suite BI Downey, California 90240 Telephone (562) 869-3034 Facsimile (562) 869-3539 Attorney for PlaintifF INEST THACKER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 COMPTON COURTHOUSE 11 INEST THACKER, an individual, ) Case No. TC029189 12 Plaintiff, ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL 13 vs. ) RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION 14 BYRON LAMONT HALCROMB aka BYRON HALCROMB, an individual; EARLE HYMAN Original Complaint filed: 6/22i18 15 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN; entity Assigned to: Hon. Maurice A. Lei ter type unknown; MICHAEL BLAISE REYES; Dept: A 16 an individual, CHARITY LAURA MOSTAFA; an individual; UNITED WHOLESALE 17 MORTGAGE, LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1-20; and all 18 persons unknown claiming legal or equitable 19 right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real property described in the Complaint adverse to 20 Platntift's title and interest, or any cloud upon PlaintifF s title or interest thereto, named herein as DATE: October I, 2020 DOES 21-50 inclusive; TIME: 8:30 am 21 DEPT: A 22 Defendant. 23 24 COMES NOW, Plaintiff INEST THACKER ("Thacker"), by and through her attorney, and 25 hereby opposes the Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Admission by Defendants MICHAEL 26 BLAISE REYES ("Reyes") and CHARITY LAURA MOSTAFA ("Mostafa**) as follows: 27 I. INTRODUCTION 28 Thacker is a 93 year old elder who owns the real property at issue in this litigation, a home which OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION