On June 12, 2018 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Thacker Inest,
and
Earle Hyman Defined Benefit Pension Plan,
Halcromb Byron Lamont Aka Byron Halcromb,
Mostafa Charity Laura,
Reyes Michael Blaise,
United Wholesale Mortgate Llc A Michigan Limited Liability Company,
United Wholesale Mortgate Llc A Michigan Limited Liability Company Dba United Wholesale Mortgage,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FILE
Sup erior Court of alifornia \\
ounty of Los Angeles
APR 19 2023
David W. Slay fion :
xgcyitive Officer/Clerk
Y Deputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Brian McCiendor
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — SOUTH CENTRAL DISTRICT
INEST THACKER, an individual, CASE NO: TC029189
6 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFAULT JUDGMENT
AS TO BYRON LAMONT HALCROMB
vs. AKA BYRON HALCROMB, AN
INDIVIDUAL
BYRON LAMONT HALCROMB aka
BYRON HALCROMB., an individual, et al Dept. B
9 DATE: April 24, 2023
Defendants. TIME: 8:30 A.M.
10
COMPLAINT FILED: June 22, 2018
1 ) TRIAL DATE: None Set
)
12
13
14 1 BACKGROUND
15 The operative Second Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant Byron Lamont
16 Halcromb aka Byron Halcromb, an individual (“Defendant”), made representations to Plaintiff
17 Inest Thacker (“Plaintiff”) related to an abatement action against Plaintiff which caused Plaintiff
18 to believe that she may lose all her properties. (Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), 4 15.)
19 Trusting those representations by Defendant, her son, Plaintiff executed a power of attorney on
20 October 2, 2017. (SAC, 4 16.) Defendant allegedly further convinced Plaintiff that a property
221 located at 1315 South Kemp Avenue, Compton, California 90220 (“Kemp Property”) was at risk
22 if judgement was entered against Plaintiff in the abatement action. (SAC, § 18.) Defendant
Zz23 allegedly represented that he would hold title to the Kemp Property for Plaintiff and refurbish the|
24 Kemp Property for the benefit of Plaintiff. (SAC, {| 20.) Defendant allegedly made the
25 representation that the Kemp Property would be transferred right back to Plaintiff upon
Document Filed Date
April 19, 2023
Case Filing Date
June 12, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FILE Sup erior Court of alifornia \\ ounty of Los Angeles APR 19 2023 David W. Slay fion : xgcyitive Officer/Clerk Y Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Brian McCiendor FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — SOUTH CENTRAL DISTRICT INEST THACKER, an individual, CASE NO: TC029189 6 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO BYRON LAMONT HALCROMB vs. AKA BYRON HALCROMB, AN INDIVIDUAL BYRON LAMONT HALCROMB aka BYRON HALCROMB., an individual, et al Dept. B 9 DATE: April 24, 2023 Defendants. TIME: 8:30 A.M. 10 COMPLAINT FILED: June 22, 2018 1 ) TRIAL DATE: None Set ) 12 13 14 1 BACKGROUND 15 The operative Second Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant Byron Lamont 16 Halcromb aka Byron Halcromb, an individual (“Defendant”), made representations to Plaintiff 17 Inest Thacker (“Plaintiff”) related to an abatement action against Plaintiff which caused Plaintiff 18 to believe that she may lose all her properties. (Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), 4 15.) 19 Trusting those representations by Defendant, her son, Plaintiff executed a power of attorney on 20 October 2, 2017. (SAC, 4 16.) Defendant allegedly further convinced Plaintiff that a property 221 located at 1315 South Kemp Avenue, Compton, California 90220 (“Kemp Property”) was at risk 22 if judgement was entered against Plaintiff in the abatement action. (SAC, § 18.) Defendant Zz23 allegedly represented that he would hold title to the Kemp Property for Plaintiff and refurbish the| 24 Kemp Property for the benefit of Plaintiff. (SAC, {| 20.) Defendant allegedly made the 25 representation that the Kemp Property would be transferred right back to Plaintiff upon