arrow left
arrow right
  • MEYER & DOWNS LLP VS ANDREA JOY COOK ET AL Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MEYER & DOWNS LLP VS ANDREA JOY COOK ET AL Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namo, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Michael J. Saltz, Esq. [SBN 189751] |~ Jacobson, Russell, Saltz, Nassim & De La Torre LLP 1880 Century Park East, Suite 900 FILED Los Angeles, CA 90067 Superior Court of California Countyof Los Angeles TELEPHONE NO.: 310-446-9900 FAX NO. (Optionay: 310-446-9909 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional) msaltz@jrsnd.com 04/04/2019 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants and Cross-Complainants Bherri R Carter, Executive Office / Cec af Cqurt SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles By. C. Mason Deput STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP Cone: Los Angeles 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Meyer & Downs, LLP BC710428 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Andrea Joy Cook;Scattered Joy Productions, Inc JUDICIAL OFFICER Gregory W. Alarcon DEPT. NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 36 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related fo the case referenced above. 41 a. Title: Primary Wave Entertainment, LLC v. Andrea Joy Cook; Scattered Joy Productions, Inc. b. Case number: 18STCV02546 Court: same as above CI other state or federal court (name and address): Department: 57 Case type: [__] limited civil unlimited civil [ ] probate [ ] family law [ ] other (specify): Filing date: October 26, 2018 Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" [71 Yes No Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply). involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. Co arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. Co) involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. El is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending [=] dismissed [7] with [1 without prejudice [1] disposed of by judgment a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: [__] same as above [1 other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 ‘Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE wany.coutinto.ca.gov ‘CM-015 [Rey. July 1, 2007]