On April 13, 2018 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Chandrasoma Parakrama Dr.,
and
County Of Los Angeles,
Keck School Of Medicine Of The University,
University Of Southern California,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
@ e CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address) ‘FOR COURT
USE ONLY
JOHN S. WEST, ESQ. SBN: 102034
ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG
6300 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, California 90048
TELEPHONE NO. 323-653-6530 FAXNO. (Optionay:323-653-1660 : FILED
E-MAIL AODRESS (Optiona): jwest@amglaw.com Superior Court of California
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA County of Los Anceles
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOS ANGELES
street AooRess:11] North Hill Street JUN 2:6 2018
matin aooress:11] North Hill Street
cry anozip cove: Los Angeles, 90012 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse By. Huadu FLorLa, Deputy
Heather Flores
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE etc., et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [7 umrtep case BC702019
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date:July 12, 2018 Time:8:30 a.m. Dept.:58 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[) Notice of intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
U
S<
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. (2X) This statement is submitted by party (name): PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA
b. [) This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): April 13, 2018
b. [J The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. (51 Al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [1] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) 1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
« [I The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a Type of case in complaint CI cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Interference
with prospective economic advantage; Violation of Health &Saftety Code Section 1278.5; Declaratory Relief;
6 Specific Performance; Rescission.
Page 1 ofS
‘Adopted tor Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
eo ictal Councilof California ‘ules 3.720-3.730
110 (Rev. July1, 2011) ‘www .courts.ca.gov
ORIGINAL \Westiaw
Doc & Form Bude
Document Filed Date
June 26, 2018
Case Filing Date
April 13, 2018
Status
Legacy Judgment 03/22/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.