arrow left
arrow right
  • DR PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA VS KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE U Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DR PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA VS KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE U Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ e CM-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address) ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY JOHN S. WEST, ESQ. SBN: 102034 ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG 6300 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, California 90048 TELEPHONE NO. 323-653-6530 FAXNO. (Optionay:323-653-1660 : FILED E-MAIL AODRESS (Optiona): jwest@amglaw.com Superior Court of California ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA County of Los Anceles SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOS ANGELES street AooRess:11] North Hill Street JUN 2:6 2018 matin aooress:11] North Hill Street cry anozip cove: Los Angeles, 90012 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse By. Huadu FLorLa, Deputy Heather Flores PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE etc., et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [7 umrtep case BC702019 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date:July 12, 2018 Time:8:30 a.m. Dept.:58 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [) Notice of intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): U S< INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. (2X) This statement is submitted by party (name): PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA b. [) This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): April 13, 2018 b. [J The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. (51 Al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [1] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) 1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): « [I The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a Type of case in complaint CI cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Interference with prospective economic advantage; Violation of Health &Saftety Code Section 1278.5; Declaratory Relief; 6 Specific Performance; Rescission. Page 1 ofS ‘Adopted tor Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, eo ictal Councilof California ‘ules 3.720-3.730 110 (Rev. July1, 2011) ‘www .courts.ca.gov ORIGINAL \Westiaw Doc & Form Bude