Party Statement: DR PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA VS KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE U

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/16/2019 05:52 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by F. Ochoa,Deputy Clerk


                                                                                                                                                                    CM-110
            ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):                                                    FOR COURT USE ONLY


           David J. Weiss, Esq.(SBN 78542)/Elizabeth A. Bright, Esq.(SBN 280129)
           Law Offices of David J. Weiss
           1 1340 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90064
                                       J7r
                   TELEPHONE NO.: 3~ O-r J-9r
                                            J6F)     F~c No. ~oPtionap: 310-575-9576
                E-MAIL ADDRESS(Opfional): tj►'19ht2@dfW~aW.00171

                  ATTORNEY FOR (Name): pgfgndant (~,OUIItY Of LOS Aflg@IBS

             SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, couNTY of LOS ANGELES
                STREET ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~ NOI~II HIII Stf00t

                MAILING ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~ NOI~h HIII StC'@et

             CITY AND ZIP CODE: LOS ACIg@IeS 9OO ~ Z

                   BRANCH NAME: Centra~

                  P~a,irvriFFiPETiTioNER: DR. PARAKRAMA CHANDRASOMA
           DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, BtC., et al
                                                                                                                          CASE NUMBER:
                                             CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
           (Check one):            ~✓         UNLIMITED CASE           0 LIMITED CASE                                       BC702019
                                             (Amount demanded           (Amount demanded is $25,000
                                             exceeds $25,000)            or less)

           A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
           Date: January 23, 2019                          Time: 8:30 a.m.                Dept.: 58                    Div.:                         Room:
           Address of court (if different from the address above):

           0Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):

                           INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
           1.     Party or parties (answer one):
                  a. ~✓      This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant County of Los Aneles
                  b. ~ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):


          2.      Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
                  a. The complaint was filed on (date):
                  b. 0 The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):

          3.      Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
                  a. 0 All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
                  b. ~ The following parties named in the complaint orcross-complaint
                             (1) 0 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):

                               (2) 0 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):

                               (3) ~ have had a default entered against them (specify names):

                  c. ~ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature ofinvolvement in case, and date by which
                       they maybe served):


          4.      Description of case
                  a. Type of case in 0✓             complaint         ~ cross-complaint                  (Describe, including causes of action):
                        This is an employment action in which Plaintiff alleges that he was retaliated against by Defendants because of
                        complaints he made regarding patient safety.
                                                                                                                                                                      Page 1 of b
          Form Adopted for Mandatory Use                                                                                                                       Cal. Rules of Court,
            Judicial Council of California
                                                                  CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT                                                                      rules 3.720-3.730
            CM-110[Rev. July 1, 2011]                                                                                                                           www.courts.ca.gov