On May 25, 2018 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency,
and
Interes All Persons Unknown Claiming An,
Paayas Editha T.,
Paayas Jumayde N.,
Southern California Edison Company,
for Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
® ®
William J. Brunick, Esq. (State Bar No. 46289
Leland P. McE!
BRUNICK, McEL
1839 Commercenter West
HANEY
State Bar No. 39257
& KENNEDY, PLC Exempt from filing fee pursuant to
Gor tion 6103
P.O. Box 131
Bourn
Court of California
an Bernardino, California 92423-3130 tyv of Las Annales,
Telephone:
acsumile: )
909) 889-8301
109 388-1889
E-Mail: bbrunick@bmklawplc.com
MAY 25 2018
Sherri R. G; uve Officen/Clerk
E-Mail: Imcelhaney@bmklawplc.com By. Deputy
len
Attorneys for Plainti ff,
ANTELOPE VALLE 'Y-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
11
BC 7 07 589
12
ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN
13 WATER AGENCY, a Public Agency,
Case No.:
14 Plaintiff,
15 vs. COMPLAINT IN EMINENT
Jumayde N. Paayas, Editha T. Paayas;
Southern California Edison Compan: ¥
16
17 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; and al
persons unknown claiming an interest in
18 the property described in e complaint,
19 Defendants.
20
21
Plaintiff, Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (hereafter, “Plaintiff”), for a
22
cause of action against the Defendants, and each of them, alleges:
23
1 Plaintiff, the Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (AVEK), a public
24
agency, is and at all times herein mentioned was a State Water Contractor empowered to
25
import State Project Water into the Antelope Valley and to store water underground for
26
future use by it customers, and is vested by law with authority to exercise the power of
27
eminent domain to acquire private property for public use.
28
COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN
1
Document Filed Date
May 25, 2018
Case Filing Date
May 25, 2018
Category
Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Consolidated (Non-lead case) 02/01/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
® ® William J. Brunick, Esq. (State Bar No. 46289 Leland P. McE! BRUNICK, McEL 1839 Commercenter West HANEY State Bar No. 39257 & KENNEDY, PLC Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Gor tion 6103 P.O. Box 131 Bourn Court of California an Bernardino, California 92423-3130 tyv of Las Annales, Telephone: acsumile: ) 909) 889-8301 109 388-1889 E-Mail: bbrunick@bmklawplc.com MAY 25 2018 Sherri R. G; uve Officen/Clerk E-Mail: Imcelhaney@bmklawplc.com By. Deputy len Attorneys for Plainti ff, ANTELOPE VALLE 'Y-EAST KERN WATER AGENCY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 BC 7 07 589 12 ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN 13 WATER AGENCY, a Public Agency, Case No.: 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. COMPLAINT IN EMINENT Jumayde N. Paayas, Editha T. Paayas; Southern California Edison Compan: ¥ 16 17 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; and al persons unknown claiming an interest in 18 the property described in e complaint, 19 Defendants. 20 21 Plaintiff, Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (hereafter, “Plaintiff”), for a 22 cause of action against the Defendants, and each of them, alleges: 23 1 Plaintiff, the Antelope Valley - East Kern Water Agency (AVEK), a public 24 agency, is and at all times herein mentioned was a State Water Contractor empowered to 25 import State Project Water into the Antelope Valley and to store water underground for 26 future use by it customers, and is vested by law with authority to exercise the power of 27 eminent domain to acquire private property for public use. 28 COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN 1