arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHN DOE VS CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOHN DOE VS CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/16/2019 08:31 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk APALLA U. CHOPRA (S.B. # 163207) achopra@omm.com 2 CHRISTIANNA KYRIACOU (S.B. #313379) ckyriacou@omm.com 3 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 9007 1-2899 Telephone: + 1 213 430 6000 5 Facsimile: + l 2 13 430 6407 6 Attorneys for Respondent Claremont McKenna College 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 CENTRAL DIVISION lI JOHN DOE, and individual, Case o. BS 174089 12 Petitioner, DECLARATIO OF YREE GRAY IN 13 SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT V. 14 CLAREMO T MCKEN A CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE, a COLLEGE'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION 15 Cali fornia corporation; and DOES l to 20, TO PETITIO FOR WRJT OF inclusive, MANDAMUS 16 Respondents. Judge: Hon. Mary H. Strobel 17 Dept: 82 Petition Filed: June 29, 2018 18 Trial Date: October 15, 20 I9 Time: 9:30 a.m. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GRAY DECL. ISO RESPONDE T'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS