On September 11, 2018 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bradbury D.D.S., Michael G,
Bradbury, Rhonda,
Odeh, Ali,
and
Cohan, Kat,
Odeh, Ali,
Fernandez D.D.S, Lyngladen,
Fernandez Dds, Lyngladen,
Kingsley Dentistry,
Kingsly Dentistry,
Lyngadlen Fernandez Dds,
Lyngladen Fernandez D.D.S.,
Ringo Bangalan Dds,
Silagan-Fernandez D.D.S., Lyngadlen,
Suarez-Fernandez Dentistry,
Suarez Fernandez Dentistry And Ringo Bangalan, Dds,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
Jerry S. Akita (SBN 130643)
LAW OFFICE OF JERRY S AKITA
32158 Camino Capistrano, Ste. A—194 f5. 1
-
2,???
" ‘ ’
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
(949) 248—] 021
¥
Attorneys for Defendant, .‘ILPael..:%1
LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ, D.D.S., Individually and
dba KINGSLY DENTISTRY
gEx
'2‘
a
v
.A
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ALI ODEH, CASE NO.: CIVDS] 823772
Plaintiff, ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO:
JUDGE JOHN M. PACHECO
v. DEPARTMENT $31
Lyngladen Fernandez; Kingsly Dentistry DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF OBJEC'I‘IONS
and Does 1 through 10, TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY
PLAINTIFF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR,
Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DATE: August l, 2023
TIME: 8:30
DEPT: 3]
[Filed (.‘(mc'urren/ly with Defendant 's
Opposition m Motionfbr Summary .ludgmenl.‘
Separate Staremem in Opposition; and
Declaration (gillerry S. Akita with Exhibils/
Complaint Filed.- 9/11/2018
Trial Date: 8/28/2023
COMES NOW Defendant, LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ, D.D.S., Individually and
dba KINGSLY DENTISTRY with the following objections to the Evidence in Exhibits and
Declarations submitted by plaintiffin Support 0f Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
”NbTiCE ‘O-F OBJEC'I'Q'I'ONSWbF' DEFENDANT LYNGLADEN FERNANID'EZWED‘Sf"KN’DJIZ’I'NGSLY
DENTISTRY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
_.Ma.t.cria1 0b.iec..t.edfr_.o ,_ _ .
Objectiqns . -Ryliug_.._ _. .
[\J
1. The Declaration ofAli ()dch in Plaintiff’s documents arc vague
'u)
Sustained ____ __
ils entirety. and ambiguous. and confusing
since he served defendant with Overruled ___
two sets 0f documents, (1) first
on May 17. 2023 at 6:49pm and
(2) “amended” documents 0n
May l8, 2023 at 7:25pm.
-
Responding party is not clear
as 10 which set ofdocuments is
now before the court.
A-
The Declarations ofPIaintiff
Ali Odeh Plaintiffserved at
different times have some
altered content. E.g. See
Paragraph 9 in each
Declaration. The two versions
are attached as Exhibits N and
O t0 the Declaration oflerry S.
,_ _ ,
Akita.
2. 1n the Declarations ofAli ()a’eh Hearsay. Evidence Cdde §1200
Sustained
(served on 5/] 7/2023 and
5/1 8/2023) Overruled _VA__
Objection is made to 117, “At thc
consultation, Lyngladen Fernandez,
D.D.S. (“Fernandez") assured me
_L11at_ ‘fhgr an_d> onlyher” would V V
2
‘OFWO'BJECTIONS 0F DEFENDANT LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ,“D.’D.s.”AND“ KINGSLY
'NOTI’CE
DENTISTRY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
July 13, 2023
Case Filing Date
September 11, 2018
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Jerry S. Akita (SBN 130643) LAW OFFICE OF JERRY S AKITA 32158 Camino Capistrano, Ste. A—194 f5. 1 - 2,??? " ‘ ’ San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 (949) 248—] 021 ¥ Attorneys for Defendant, .‘ILPael..:%1 LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ, D.D.S., Individually and dba KINGSLY DENTISTRY gEx '2‘ a v .A SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ALI ODEH, CASE NO.: CIVDS] 823772 Plaintiff, ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO: JUDGE JOHN M. PACHECO v. DEPARTMENT $31 Lyngladen Fernandez; Kingsly Dentistry DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF OBJEC'I‘IONS and Does 1 through 10, TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR, Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATE: August l, 2023 TIME: 8:30 DEPT: 3] [Filed (.‘(mc'urren/ly with Defendant 's Opposition m Motionfbr Summary .ludgmenl.‘ Separate Staremem in Opposition; and Declaration (gillerry S. Akita with Exhibils/ Complaint Filed.- 9/11/2018 Trial Date: 8/28/2023 COMES NOW Defendant, LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ, D.D.S., Individually and dba KINGSLY DENTISTRY with the following objections to the Evidence in Exhibits and Declarations submitted by plaintiffin Support 0f Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. ”NbTiCE ‘O-F OBJEC'I'Q'I'ONSWbF' DEFENDANT LYNGLADEN FERNANID'EZWED‘Sf"KN’DJIZ’I'NGSLY DENTISTRY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT _.Ma.t.cria1 0b.iec..t.edfr_.o ,_ _ . Objectiqns . -Ryliug_.._ _. . [\J 1. The Declaration ofAli ()dch in Plaintiff’s documents arc vague 'u) Sustained ____ __ ils entirety. and ambiguous. and confusing since he served defendant with Overruled ___ two sets 0f documents, (1) first on May 17. 2023 at 6:49pm and (2) “amended” documents 0n May l8, 2023 at 7:25pm. - Responding party is not clear as 10 which set ofdocuments is now before the court. A- The Declarations ofPIaintiff Ali Odeh Plaintiffserved at different times have some altered content. E.g. See Paragraph 9 in each Declaration. The two versions are attached as Exhibits N and O t0 the Declaration oflerry S. ,_ _ , Akita. 2. 1n the Declarations ofAli ()a’eh Hearsay. Evidence Cdde §1200 Sustained (served on 5/] 7/2023 and 5/1 8/2023) Overruled _VA__ Objection is made to 117, “At thc consultation, Lyngladen Fernandez, D.D.S. (“Fernandez") assured me _L11at_ ‘fhgr an_d> onlyher” would V V 2 ‘OFWO'BJECTIONS 0F DEFENDANT LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ,“D.’D.s.”AND“ KINGSLY 'NOTI’CE DENTISTRY TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT