arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHN LEE VS JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOHN LEE VS JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-O1 5 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY — Michael E. Bubman, Esq., SBN 143468 Mirman, Bubman & Nahmias, LLP 21860 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 360 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 451-4600 FAX NO.(Optional): (818) 451-4620 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): mbubmanmbnlawyers.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants, PENNYMAC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 825 Maple Ave. STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: 825 Maple Ave. CITYAND ZIP CODE: Torrance, CA 90503 BRANCH NAME: Southwest District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:JAMES RYU CASE NUMBER: BC705825 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Deirdre Hill DEPT. NOTICE OF RELATED CASE M Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: John Lee v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, et al. b. Case number: YC069345 c. Court: same as above J other state or federal court (name and address): Electronically Received 08/17/2020 06:50 PM d. Department: B (Hon. Deirdre Hill, Torrance) e. Case type: J limited civil unlimited civil J probate family law J other (specify): f. Filing date: October 8, 2013 g. Has this case been designated or determined as “complex?” Li Yes No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): IZI involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1 h i. Status of case: pending dismissed with J without prejudice 1J disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: Jason Park v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, et al. b. Case number: BC573999 c. Court: same as above J other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: B (Hon. Deirdre Hill, Torrance) Page 1 of 3 FormAprovedfor Optional Use Judicial ..ouncil of California Essential NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 www courtinfo ca gay CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] 5]Formr ‘-