On October 09, 2019 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rancho Del Chino, Llc,
and
A&B Chino Hotels, Llc,
A&B Hotel Management Investment, Inc.,
Does 2 To 20,
Js Hotel Development, Inc.,
Maa Byu Hospitality, Llc,
Maa Byu Hospitality Llc,
Maru, Bharat "Brett",
Rancho Del Chino North, Llc,
for Other Civil Contracts
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
CM 015
ATTORMEY OR PARTY 1N Tt tCVi ATTt1RNE1 1ldeme ab 83t AvmbOr and tddOitJ tOR t tiR7 tlSE Oi Y
Jascan P Saccu za F q SBAt 221837
l ustin A Pinder Esq SI N326056
VIVCILI SACCUZZO LLP
310 Fqwrth Avenue San Diego CA 92I03 qU ORNiA
Q T
p o
TELEPF PNL 9932 ac 19 7 44 9994 3
s ara R a
ou v o
E uvta tE33 OpBone l SSCCtI ZO VIVO lI8W 001Tt SAN BERfiifi C VNU DISTRICT
A F
R l 2 2aza
SUPERIQR COURT C1F CALIFORMII GOUNTY OF SAA 61Ita1 diIIO
srae raoo ss 24 V 3rd Str eet
Y 1 EPUT t
tJtaaoo ss
i tE
cmr v z cx San Bernazdinq CA 92415
w 5an Bernardino Civil District
cass N a
Puur rr mo t Rancho D 1 Ghi a LLC
CIVDS 1929675
FEn Qat rt sPowQ A B Hotels Management Investment INC Jl dAl dFFiCER
r
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
S
Jdsn ty irt c ronvfog c order accuraatiir g o dete of iting alt ca rs re ated o the case referenced a6trve
a rae SA Marina LLC v R ncho L el Chino LGC
b case num r CIVD51925819
c Court Q same as bove
Q other state or federai court name r l address
d Departmenr S2S
f
e Case type Q limited c ril unlimited dvil Q prob e family taw 0 other lsPealY
f Filing date November 2U 2019
tea or c etersntr 1e
g Has is case been cles gr as n C Yes C No
h Retationshtp of th s t ase to he c ase referenced abcve c heck a that aPRfY1
Q invohres tFaa s ne parEies and is based an ti same ar similar daims
Q ar es from the same or sub tanti laliy ider d cal trar cHons inddeM ar events requiring the detarmina an af
the same or st antiaily ident Cai ques ons of law or fact
irnrolves cl ims against title to possessbn of ordarna to the same property
is lik y foN other reasons to require sut tandal dup8cation of judicial
sources if heard by differantjudges
Aclt itk 18 expi8natiort ls attaChed in a aChmerl 1 h
i Stahrs of t se
perxtErig
dism ed Q vvith without eJudice
C diap ed of by judgment
2 a r e Rancho Del Chino LLC v Jim Franchinr dba Papachinos
b Case n ml r CIVDS 1929 25
c Cour p same as at ve
other state or federas urt nam ar dac iessj
d Department S25
P 4pe 1 af 3
am ANptoasd far OP Ueo
NOTICE OF RELATED CA E t ii s WCpurt nds 3 30a
cowka orc nu
i 1 6v luiy 4 1D7j
GM 015
r s rai e r
u ru Fr rrrrn i n ho el Chi r LLe
CIVD I 296 5
p F fi RANTrRESPQNC NT A Ha l Ian g rment In es rnen T1 1
2 cvrrt nued
Case type ited ivi pr bats amily law
e I rnited civ l untirr okher fsveci y
f Filing da e C1ct4iaer 9 4I 9
g H s tht s c se been designated rrdeferrnined as c mpl x C Y es 14
ti Rela ianship af this case to ths case refe enc d ab ve chsck all that apply
in c lv s fhe s me parties nd s bas ed c n the sarrte or simi ar claims
aris s r m the sam pr substantielly identica6 transactior s incidents or sven s requirin he deterrnina tsn af
the same crr substantiakf id ntica questi a s r f law rar fac
inva ves clai ns 8g inst Itls to pbss ssion nf ar arnag s the sarrr roperty
is Mike4y for ather ceasons tp requi e substantiai dupti on ofi judicial r sourees if heard bydif er nt judg
Additianal xplan ion is tt ched in atta ht ent 2h
i Status of case
pending
dismissed with wifhhou pre udic
Q dispos d of by judgm nt
3 a Titlt
b s num er
c Caurt Q same as at ove
Q other state r federal co rt nar and ddress
a t
e C se ty pe limited civil unlimifed civi probate Q family lauv otF er sp cify
f Fili tg dat
g Has this case been designated t determined as comptex Yes Q hto
h F elatian5hip af 3Ftiis ase to the cese refer nc d aboae rrheck a 1 th f apAEY
invol es fhe same parties nd is based on Ehe same o r similar cl irns
aris s frt nn e sam or substantiatly iden ica tr nsaetions inaid nts pr uer ts re uiring the tleterrenina r n f
the sarr ar swbsEan i l y idsnticai qu s ions o 1aw or fac
inuolves daims against tit e o pass si rr nf c r damages ta th same prape ly
j is likely for ther reasons tp require substaniial du li ation ofjudicial resa rrc s iFheard by different judges
Additionel e tanatron is attached in atta ment 3h
E Status of case
Q pendsng
dismisse 3 0 with without pr judica
dispased af bY judgme it
4 Additional r at d cases re d scrtbed in A tachment 4 iVumE rof pages attachedr
t ats 1 at ch 11 2 32t1
Dustin A Pi cler
TYf E nR PR1AtY NANiE QF PAE TY QR AITTORNEI SIC NATtJRE 0F PkFt fY U AT CCIFtM
c s R sYt zoa
FlC 71C t R GAI t C1
x a
Document Filed Date
March 12, 2020
Case Filing Date
October 09, 2019
Category
Other Civil Contracts
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CM 015 ATTORMEY OR PARTY 1N Tt tCVi ATTt1RNE1 1ldeme ab 83t AvmbOr and tddOitJ tOR t tiR7 tlSE Oi Y Jascan P Saccu za F q SBAt 221837 l ustin A Pinder Esq SI N326056 VIVCILI SACCUZZO LLP 310 Fqwrth Avenue San Diego CA 92I03 qU ORNiA Q T p o TELEPF PNL 9932 ac 19 7 44 9994 3 s ara R a ou v o E uvta tE33 OpBone l SSCCtI ZO VIVO lI8W 001Tt SAN BERfiifi C VNU DISTRICT A F R l 2 2aza SUPERIQR COURT C1F CALIFORMII GOUNTY OF SAA 61Ita1 diIIO srae raoo ss 24 V 3rd Str eet Y 1 EPUT t tJtaaoo ss i tE cmr v z cx San Bernazdinq CA 92415 w 5an Bernardino Civil District cass N a Puur rr mo t Rancho D 1 Ghi a LLC CIVDS 1929675 FEn Qat rt sPowQ A B Hotels Management Investment INC Jl dAl dFFiCER r NOTICE OF RELATED CASE S Jdsn ty irt c ronvfog c order accuraatiir g o dete of iting alt ca rs re ated o the case referenced a6trve a rae SA Marina LLC v R ncho L el Chino LGC b case num r CIVD51925819 c Court Q same as bove Q other state or federai court name r l address d Departmenr S2S f e Case type Q limited c ril unlimited dvil Q prob e family taw 0 other lsPealY f Filing date November 2U 2019 tea or c etersntr 1e g Has is case been cles gr as n C Yes C No h Retationshtp of th s t ase to he c ase referenced abcve c heck a that aPRfY1 Q invohres tFaa s ne parEies and is based an ti same ar similar daims Q ar es from the same or sub tanti laliy ider d cal trar cHons inddeM ar events requiring the detarmina an af the same or st antiaily ident Cai ques ons of law or fact irnrolves cl ims against title to possessbn of ordarna to the same property is lik y foN other reasons to require sut tandal dup8cation of judicial sources if heard by differantjudges Aclt itk 18 expi8natiort ls attaChed in a aChmerl 1 h i Stahrs of t se perxtErig dism ed Q vvith without eJudice C diap ed of by judgment 2 a r e Rancho Del Chino LLC v Jim Franchinr dba Papachinos b Case n ml r CIVDS 1929 25 c Cour p same as at ve other state or federas urt nam ar dac iessj d Department S25 P 4pe 1 af 3 am ANptoasd far OP Ueo NOTICE OF RELATED CA E t ii s WCpurt nds 3 30a cowka orc nu i 1 6v luiy 4 1D7j GM 015 r s rai e r u ru Fr rrrrn i n ho el Chi r LLe CIVD I 296 5 p F fi RANTrRESPQNC NT A Ha l Ian g rment In es rnen T1 1 2 cvrrt nued Case type ited ivi pr bats amily law e I rnited civ l untirr okher fsveci y f Filing da e C1ct4iaer 9 4I 9 g H s tht s c se been designated rrdeferrnined as c mpl x C Y es 14 ti Rela ianship af this case to ths case refe enc d ab ve chsck all that apply in c lv s fhe s me parties nd s bas ed c n the sarrte or simi ar claims aris s r m the sam pr substantielly identica6 transactior s incidents or sven s requirin he deterrnina tsn af the same crr substantiakf id ntica questi a s r f law rar fac inva ves clai ns 8g inst Itls to pbss ssion nf ar arnag s the sarrr roperty is Mike4y for ather ceasons tp requi e substantiai dupti on ofi judicial r sourees if heard bydif er nt judg Additianal xplan ion is tt ched in atta ht ent 2h i Status of case pending dismissed with wifhhou pre udic Q dispos d of by judgm nt 3 a Titlt b s num er c Caurt Q same as at ove Q other state r federal co rt nar and ddress a t e C se ty pe limited civil unlimifed civi probate Q family lauv otF er sp cify f Fili tg dat g Has this case been designated t determined as comptex Yes Q hto h F elatian5hip af 3Ftiis ase to the cese refer nc d aboae rrheck a 1 th f apAEY invol es fhe same parties nd is based on Ehe same o r similar cl irns aris s frt nn e sam or substantiatly iden ica tr nsaetions inaid nts pr uer ts re uiring the tleterrenina r n f the sarr ar swbsEan i l y idsnticai qu s ions o 1aw or fac inuolves daims against tit e o pass si rr nf c r damages ta th same prape ly j is likely for ther reasons tp require substaniial du li ation ofjudicial resa rrc s iFheard by different judges Additionel e tanatron is attached in atta ment 3h E Status of case Q pendsng dismisse 3 0 with without pr judica dispased af bY judgme it 4 Additional r at d cases re d scrtbed in A tachment 4 iVumE rof pages attachedr t ats 1 at ch 11 2 32t1 Dustin A Pi cler TYf E nR PR1AtY NANiE QF PAE TY QR AITTORNEI SIC NATtJRE 0F PkFt fY U AT CCIFtM c s R sYt zoa FlC 71C t R GAI t C1 x a