On April 17, 2018 a
Reply - REPLY DEFENDANTS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 [MIL 13] TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFFS NON-RETAINED EXPERT WITNESSES AS
was filed
involving a dispute between
Gillon Britney,
Mcdougal Raenelle Annette,
and
Estate Of Eric D. Vasquez Deceased,
Vasquez Eric Daniel,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/26/2022 11:52 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Williams,Deputy Clerk
1 PATRICK K. O’BRIEN, ESQ. (SBN 167957)
STEVE PABROS, ESQ. (SBN 120952)
2 O’BRIEN LAW, P.C.
755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185
3 Petaluma, California 94954
Telephone: (707) 789-6500
4 Facsimile: (707) 789-6520
Email: patrick@pobrienlaw.com
5 steve@pobrienlaw.com
suzie@pobrienlaw.com
6
Attorneys for Defendants
7 ERIC D. VASQUEZ, Estate of ERIC D.
VASQUEZ, Deceased
8
9
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
11
12 RAENELLE ANNETTE MCDOUGAL AND Case No. BC702424
O’Brien Law, P.C.
BRITTNEY GILLON;
755 Baywood Dr., Ste. 185
13 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’
Petaluma, CA 94954
Tel: (707) 789-6500
Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED OBJECTION AND
14 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 [MIL 13] TO
15 EXCLUDE TESTIMONY FROM
ERIC DANIEL VASQUEZ, et al. PLAINTIFFS’ NON-RETAINED EXPERT
16 WITNESSES AS PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO
Defendants. COMPLY WITH CCP §2034.260
17
Trial Date: August 29, 2022
18 Trial Time: 8:30 a.m.
FSC Date: August 15, 2022
19
FSC Time: 10:00 a.m.
20 Department: 30
Complaint Filed: April 17, 2018
21
22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
23 Without waiving Defendants ERIC D. VASQUEZ and Estate of ERIC D. VASQUEZ,
24 Deceased (hereinafter “Defendants”) previous objections to RAENELLE ANNETTE
25 MCDOUGAL and BRITTNEY GILLON’s (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) Objections to Each of
26 Defendants’ Motions in Limine No. 1-16, Defendants hereby submit the following Reply to
27 Plaintiffs’ First Amended Objection and Opposition to Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 13.
28 //
-1-
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE
NO. 13 [MIL 13] TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFFS’ NON-RETAINED EXPERT WITNESSES AS PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO
COMPLY WITH CCP §2034.260
Document Filed Date
August 26, 2022
Case Filing Date
April 17, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/26/2022 11:52 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Williams,Deputy Clerk 1 PATRICK K. O’BRIEN, ESQ. (SBN 167957) STEVE PABROS, ESQ. (SBN 120952) 2 O’BRIEN LAW, P.C. 755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185 3 Petaluma, California 94954 Telephone: (707) 789-6500 4 Facsimile: (707) 789-6520 Email: patrick@pobrienlaw.com 5 steve@pobrienlaw.com suzie@pobrienlaw.com 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 ERIC D. VASQUEZ, Estate of ERIC D. VASQUEZ, Deceased 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 12 RAENELLE ANNETTE MCDOUGAL AND Case No. BC702424 O’Brien Law, P.C. BRITTNEY GILLON; 755 Baywood Dr., Ste. 185 13 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ Petaluma, CA 94954 Tel: (707) 789-6500 Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED OBJECTION AND 14 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 [MIL 13] TO 15 EXCLUDE TESTIMONY FROM ERIC DANIEL VASQUEZ, et al. PLAINTIFFS’ NON-RETAINED EXPERT 16 WITNESSES AS PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO Defendants. COMPLY WITH CCP §2034.260 17 Trial Date: August 29, 2022 18 Trial Time: 8:30 a.m. FSC Date: August 15, 2022 19 FSC Time: 10:00 a.m. 20 Department: 30 Complaint Filed: April 17, 2018 21 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 23 Without waiving Defendants ERIC D. VASQUEZ and Estate of ERIC D. VASQUEZ, 24 Deceased (hereinafter “Defendants”) previous objections to RAENELLE ANNETTE 25 MCDOUGAL and BRITTNEY GILLON’s (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) Objections to Each of 26 Defendants’ Motions in Limine No. 1-16, Defendants hereby submit the following Reply to 27 Plaintiffs’ First Amended Objection and Opposition to Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 13. 28 // -1- DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 [MIL 13] TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFFS’ NON-RETAINED EXPERT WITNESSES AS PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CCP §2034.260